No decision by Commish yet because.... - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2007, 06:27 AM   #1
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 46
Default No decision by Commish yet because....

He realizes that this is a lit powderkeg and whatever decision is handed down has the potential to rock the foundations of the entire league (past, present and future.) Face it, we're not speaking of a player or players. We're speaking of an entire organization, it's ownership, players, coaches and fan base. We're speaking of an enterprise in itself! I'm confident the reason the Commish has not had any formal comment on the situation is that he is gathering as much input from intellectuals from several diffferent backgrounds on what might be the potential repercussions his final decision will have. This whole "camera-gate" is completely out of control from players to coaches to owners to investors to sponsers....the list is long. The Commish knows this. Whatever decision is handed down, will be precise and deliberate and with the best interest of keeping the integrity of the entire NFL intact.

Please post your comments on this~!
thunder509s is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-13-2007, 06:32 AM   #2
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 8,342
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder509s View Post
He realizes that this is a lit powderkeg and whatever decision is handed down has the potential to rock the foundations of the entire league (past, present and future.) Face it, we're not speaking of a player or players. We're speaking of an entire organization, it's ownership, players, coaches and fan base. We're speaking of an enterprise in itself! I'm confident the reason the Commish has not had any formal comment on the situation is that he is gathering as much input from intellectuals from several diffferent backgrounds on what might be the potential repercussions his final decision will have. This whole "camera-gate" is completely out of control from players to coaches to owners to investors to sponsers....the list is long. The Commish knows this. Whatever decision is handed down, will be precise and deliberate and with the best interest of keeping the integrity of the entire NFL intact.

Please post your comments on this~!
I'd agree. Time will calm this down.

Is this the Commish who write this by the way?
__________________
"There are two categories of superbowl participants that nobody remembers:

The team that lost the game and the team that only won one." Dwight White- Steelers
MrBigglesWorth is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 06:35 AM   #3
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
PatsWSB47's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,297
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

I hope he's fair but I have a feeling he's going to cave in and hand down a whopper penalty. He may even go the extra mile to "prove" he's in charge. The funny thing for the other coaches and owners is that the "careful what you wish for" saying will someday soon come back and bite them in the azz. you don't think their cheating ways won't be exposed by Bill? I'm sure he has some stories to tell the Comish. If he gets evidence, he'll be forced to hand down equally harsh penalties.
PatsWSB47 is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 06:36 AM   #4
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 246
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

I don't doubt that Goodell is genuinely pissed off. And I'm sure for the last few days he's had guys like Polian and Fisher in his ear yelling for blood. But I also think, and as we've started to hear in the media the last few days, that the voices of reason are getting to him as well. Don't underestimate his relationship with Kraft.

So we should all be grateful that they are taking their time on this and didn't do something reactionary on Monday.

I feel like we are going to made examples of and Goodell will have to SOMETHING in order to not come off like a patsie (this is where his relationship with Kraft hurts us - remember Peter King's comments when Goodell got the job?) but I don't think there will be any suspensions or high draft picks involved in the penalty.

and don't think for a minute the media firestorm wasn't orchestrated to make sure that Goodell didn't let this whole thing slide. wouldn't be at all surprised if it was Polian and his cronies on the competition committee leaking reports about Belichick going to new york and goodell being pissed, and talk of suspensions and soforth. that way if Goodell does anything short of that he comes off as being in Krafts pocket.
naclone is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 06:44 AM   #5
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Patriot_in_NY's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 8,333
My Mood: Blah
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

I don't think a suspension will be given. If his decision hurts the in-season ability of a potential SB, you can bet that forces will expose the whole ugly underbelly of this league, and that is something the commish does not want.
Patriot_in_NY is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 07:10 AM   #6
Banned
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,499
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriot_in_NY View Post
I don't think a suspension will be given. If his decision hurts the in-season ability of a potential SB, you can bet that forces will expose the whole ugly underbelly of this league, and that is something the commish does not want.
The more and more I hear about "everybody does it", the more and more I think the NFL will do it's best to sweep this under the rug. No way will they say the Pats cheated, no way. Teams will be exposing each other left and right, and the Pats will take it out on someone else, I guarantee.

I'd like to add that I think the NFL is waiting til Friday (probably afternoon) because it will be a lighter penalty than people expect and it won't grab as much attention as it would today. They are probably aiming for the shortest timeframe between the announcement of the punishment and Sunday night's game.

Last edited by richpats; 09-13-2007 at 07:11 AM..
richpats is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 07:22 AM   #7
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,795
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

The integrity of the NFL? What does this have to do with integrity?

Let me present an opposing view. if you read the NFL's actual prohibition against videotaping, you'll see that no mention at all is made of stealing signals. The rule only addresses making a videotape of an opposing coach's signals. Now, you and I know what the intent is, but why is the NFL hell-bent on avoiding legilsation that involves the use of stolen signals?

The NFL can't legislate this because it's such an ingrained part of the game. There is no before and after here, no "before cheating was uncovered," and no league "after cheating was uncovered." There is only an always. There always was this sort of cheating, and always will be, until they install radio receivers in defensive helmets.

Since they couldn't legislate against it, an unspoken rule developed that I'm sure everyone thought they understood. One, don't do it blatantly. Two, never make accusations of cheating like this because the NFL has no way to adjudicate the accusation without calling into question the NFL's stance on stealing signals. We're in a big gray area. Both the Patriots and the Jets have broken the spirit of the NFL's unspoken stance. The Patriots were too brazen, and the Jets were too ratfinkish. The Patriots will be punished, and they should be, but I'm sure the commissioner is right now pissed that the Jets have invited a slew of lawyers and bureaucrats into the room to look over what was previously a gentleman's agreement. We already know the NFL's true feelings on this issue because they declared the Dolphins cheating last year as valid and legal. now the Jets have forced them into a tight spot. New legislation is needed, and now we're going to endure endless Sundays of teams sicking their security and lawyers on one another.

That's what this entire event means. It has very little to do with the game, or the game's integrity. It has everything to do with people's egos, lawyers, the NFL's own screwed up organization which allows the competition committee to be composed of a few select teams that inevitably tilt the field in their own favor.
upstater1 is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 07:22 AM   #8
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,246
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsSB42 View Post
you don't think their cheating ways won't be exposed by Bill? I'm sure he has some stories to tell the Comish. If he gets evidence, he'll be forced to hand down equally harsh penalties.

No I don't, that is what separates him from Mangini, BB has been involved with the game too long, has too many alliances, is too well thought of when the microphones are taken away and too much smarts to just roll over on someone.. he will take his lumps and walk away as a man, as for the next time he plays the Jets he will develop a game plan that will embarass Mangini.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline  
Old 09-13-2007, 07:30 AM   #9
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
FirstAndGoal's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,148
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

The Patriots lawyer just made his case to the Commish. Here's the link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8uCS9wcyQ4
FirstAndGoal is online now  
Old 09-13-2007, 07:42 AM   #10
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: on the dock o' the bay
Posts: 2,473
Default Re: No decision by Commish yet because....

Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1 View Post
The integrity of the NFL? What does this have to do with integrity?

Let me present an opposing view. if you read the NFL's actual prohibition against videotaping, you'll see that no mention at all is made of stealing signals. The rule only addresses making a videotape of an opposing coach's signals. Now, you and I know what the intent is, but why is the NFL hell-bent on avoiding legilsation that involves the use of stolen signals?

The NFL can't legislate this because it's such an ingrained part of the game. There is no before and after here, no "before cheating was uncovered," and no league "after cheating was uncovered." There is only an always. There always was this sort of cheating, and always will be, until they install radio receivers in defensive helmets.

Since they couldn't legislate against it, an unspoken rule developed that I'm sure everyone thought they understood. One, don't do it blatantly. Two, never make accusations of cheating like this because the NFL has no way to adjudicate the accusation without calling into question the NFL's stance on stealing signals. We're in a big gray area. Both the Patriots and the Jets have broken the spirit of the NFL's unspoken stance. The Patriots were too brazen, and the Jets were too ratfinkish. The Patriots will be punished, and they should be, but I'm sure the commissioner is right now pissed that the Jets have invited a slew of lawyers and bureaucrats into the room to look over what was previously a gentleman's agreement. We already know the NFL's true feelings on this issue because they declared the Dolphins cheating last year as valid and legal. now the Jets have forced them into a tight spot. New legislation is needed, and now we're going to endure endless Sundays of teams sicking their security and lawyers on one another.

That's what this entire event means. It has very little to do with the game, or the game's integrity. It has everything to do with people's egos, lawyers, the NFL's own screwed up organization which allows the competition committee to be composed of a few select teams that inevitably tilt the field in their own favor.
Great post!
__________________
Enjoying this Championship era!!
PatsChick87 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC