Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent... - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2007, 07:58 PM   #21
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 2,795
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 37Harrison View Post
Is he really better than anyone else on the roster right now? Maybe he would provide some TC competition but I can't see him beating any LB that is on the team now for a spot on the final roster. I thought the first time around was enough.
I'm not doing cartwheels about this, but if Brown did make the final 53, what does that say about some of the LB's now on the roster?
PatsSteve1 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-11-2007, 01:34 AM   #22
Banned
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 807
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

We were having a *Football* conversation here. What happened?
patpatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 05:34 AM   #23
Minuteman Target
 
Mike the Brit's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,044
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by patpatriot View Post
I think that when Brown was actually being useful for the Pats he was a 3rd down only specialist used to either cover a TE/RB or used to rush the passer. Seeing that Vrabel/Thomas/Colvin can all pass rush, what would his role be? I guess he would be just depth and maybe he can play ST? What does he bring to the party that is better than one of the kids?
Well, assuming that Alexander/Woods or another younger player doesn't make a compelling case for playing time, the Patriots are thin at inside linebacker with just Bruschi and Seau, so Thomas and/or Vrabel will have to take some of that load. In that case, there would be a place for an OLB across from Colvin on some downs at least.

Signing another linebacker for depth makes a lot of sense to me -- whether it should be Chad Brown is another matter.
__________________
My prized possessions: Our family pictures; my dad and me getting doused by Bruschi in Super Bowl XXXIX [Shalize Manza Young Up Close with ... Bill Belichick]


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


They say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Well, Pats fans should be invincible by now. [Fitzy, 16 November 2009]

Still here to learn
Mike the Brit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 08:03 PM   #24
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,149
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike the Brit View Post
Signing another linebacker for depth makes a lot of sense to me -- whether it should be Chad Brown is another matter.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/fa?po...ositionId%3d30

http://nflexperts.scout.com/a.z?s=21...3&rc=16&pid=27

http://www.kffl.com/static/nfl/featu...tion=LB&y=2007

A cursory examination of those lists shows me that the only possible UFA candidates who fit the 3-4 OLB size requirements of the NEP might be Carlos Emmons (durability issues), Grant Irons (back issues) and Nick Speegle (talent issues). In other words, this particular cupboard's pretty bare. If anyone thinks that I missed someone, let us know.

I suppose that Chad Brown could possibly serve as mentor/competition to Pierre Woods and Justin Rogers. Nothing wrong with that; however, I am still hoping against hope that the FO addresses the need at ILB. There are still several qualified candidates available, starting with Isaiah Kacyvenski.
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 09:02 PM   #25
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
WhiZa's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 5,019
My Mood: Busy
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

There's a need at ILB? The starters are pretty set in stone. I don't believe there's an ability to upgrade from the current FAs with Mays, Alexander, Lua waiting in the wings.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- 4 years =
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
WhiZa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 09:42 PM   #26
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
OhExaulted1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MIlton, NH
Posts: 1,738
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

Chad Brown would probably make a good LB's assistant coach, so why not keep him around and let him compete for a job?

Back in his heyday Chad was a 3 time Pro-Bowler. Having him in TC hurts us how?
OhExaulted1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 11:53 PM   #27
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,643
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Box_O_Rocks View Post
Let's see, Chad was playing alongside Beisel, he was playing behind a struggling Wilfork who didn't get his head right until much later, they lost Sey for a few games in that stretch...plus the new system/out of position arguments.

Chad's re-signing would be insurance, anyone telling me the kids on the roster look better than he does wasn't watching too closely when those kids got late game reps. I believe there's room on the roster to sign him for TC and not lose one of the young kids trying to make the league. Of course this could just be an agent playing one club against another too.
Hate to flip flop with you on this one, but i think we're set for senior citizen LBs this year if Jr.s healthy. Why impede the progress of one of our youngsters?

Let him play in camp, but if everyone looks good, cut him. Good, if old, 5 man rotation and I would like to see a youngster fight for some PT while kicking butt on special teams.

I think Brown can hang around in shape in case of injuries.

I don't think any team in the league would put him on the 53 at this stage.
__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT
RayClay is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 12:00 AM   #28
In the Starting Line-up
 
PATRIOT64's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northeastern PA
Posts: 3,775
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OhExaulted1 View Post
Chad Brown would probably make a good LB's assistant coach, so why not keep him around and let him compete for a job?

Back in his heyday Chad was a 3 time Pro-Bowler. Having him in TC hurts us how?
What does previous Pro Bowl accomplishments mean in today's NFL? - Squat

Hell, Andre Tippett was in even more pro bowls than Chad - I don't want Andre as a LB on this 2007 team either
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PATRIOT64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 07:51 AM   #29
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
dryheat44's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NOVA
Posts: 6,156
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOT64 View Post
What does previous pro bowl accomplishments mean in todays NFL?- Squat

Hell,Andre Tippett was in even more pro bowls than Chad - I don't want Andre as a LB on this 2007 team either
Yet I wouldn't have a problem inviting him to camp if he wanted to attend and try to make the team. But I do have to draw the line at Ray Nitchske.
__________________
When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee
dryheat44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 12:59 PM   #30
Practice Squad
 
Asante4prez's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 102
Default Re: Chad Brown possibly back? Per Agent...

Please no! What a washed up player, him and Beisel never fit into our system, we still just have to cut our losses on them....
Asante4prez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563