Chad Jackson: What Th'? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2007, 07:35 AM   #1
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,821
My Mood: Angelic
Default Chad Jackson: What Th'?

Okay. We all saw last year that Chad was at pains to stay on the field, and at even greater pains to contribute. That was among a WR merry-go-round system, with Gabriel popping in and then back out, with Caldwells and Gaffneys added as the need arose -- that is, always -- etc.

My question is this: Anybody here think he fights his way through to more than a bit part in Tom Brady's Flying Circus for the upcoming year?

There wasn't much to his performance last year. This year the WR logjam is formidable. To get to play he's looking at the guys who beat him last year (Gaffney, Caldwell,) plus a guy with "potential" written all over him (Washington,) a reliable slot guy (Welker), and two potential superstars (Moss and Stallworth.)

Does Chad emerge this year as "in the mix"? Anybody enthusiastic about him, and think he'll be this year's surprise?

My take -- Cap-wise, it would be great to see him shoot up the charts, of course. Probability-wise... well, let's just say it would also be great if I could crap icecream, and instead of raw physical attraction, supermodels responded to humorous muttering on bulletin boards. In other words, a desireable but improbable state of affairs.

Discuss.

PFnV
PatsFanInVa is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-28-2007, 08:02 AM   #2
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,371
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

I think that Jackson has as good a chance as any of emerging "in the mix," assuming that his work ethic is better than it was reported to be last year.

Right now, the receiver situation looks awesome on paper, but there are so many unknowns that almost anyone of the guys you name could emerge as a number one or two target.

You rightly chose the term "circus" to describe this, as there are going to be at least three rings and lots of juggling. Like everyone else out here, I'm hoping that the new pieces fall in place and mesh with Brady and that we have a lights-out offense with Maroney running for 1,000 yards to boot. But, no one's caught a pass yet.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.
PatsFanSince74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 08:05 AM   #3
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Tunescribe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,931
My Mood: Brooding
Send a message via AIM to Tunescribe
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

I would have to say that judging by all the WR help brought in it appears the coaching staff has little if any faith that Chad will contribute this year. Whether that's because of injury, slow development, or both, who knows? But I'd have to think from those moves and the numbers logjam that he's destined for IR. Put him in the bank and let him accrue interest for 2008.
Tunescribe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 08:20 AM   #4
Moderator
 
pats1's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,261
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

I think this year will be more or less a redshirt season for him. He could go on PUP, but if he doesn't, I envision him as a 6th WR with a significant contribution to special teams.

Next year is the key.

Moss and Stallworth are likely out of here. Caldwell and Gaffney's contracts are up after this year. That leaves Welker, Washington, Jackson, and possibly a draft pick.
pats1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 08:26 AM   #5
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,821
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pats1 View Post
I think this year will be more or less a redshirt season for him. He could go on PUP, but if he doesn't, I envision him as a 6th WR with a significant contribution to special teams.

Next year is the key.

Moss and Stallworth are likely out of here. Caldwell and Gaffney's contracts are up after this year. That leaves Welker, Washington, Jackson, and possibly a draft pick.
I could see retention of Moss, if Stallworth excels, or if he is really "all about the rings" now. I could see Stallworth redoing his deal if he does not reach 1000 yards or thereabouts. In other words, this situation might be one or the other, rather than neither. Of course, if someone else rears up and becomes the #2 (seems unlikely, but in the Pats' passing game, whoever is open is the #1 that play...) well, it will be hard to argue for a massive expenditure if your number say you were #3.

I think for the future you're basically right, though... we're throwing it at the wall and seeing what sticks.

PFnV
PatsFanInVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 08:49 AM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,866
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

Chad Jackson should have another non-factor this year.

The good news is that it won't matter because of Moss, Stallworth, and Welker. Even if he wasn't having the injury problems, Jackson would still be hard-pressed to find time in our suddenly loaded WR corp.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
brdmaverick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 09:13 AM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 
SeanBruschi54's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Bedford, MA
Posts: 3,392
My Mood: Daring
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pats1 View Post
I think this year will be more or less a redshirt season for him. He could go on PUP, but if he doesn't, I envision him as a 6th WR with a significant contribution to special teams.

Next year is the key.

Moss and Stallworth are likely out of here. Caldwell and Gaffney's contracts are up after this year. That leaves Welker, Washington, Jackson, and possibly a draft pick.
Holy crap you think 4 WR's will leave without the team retaining one of them?

Honest to god i think right now they keep one of Stallworth or Moss.
SeanBruschi54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 09:31 AM   #8
Moderator
 
pats1's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,261
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanBruschi54 View Post
Holy crap you think 4 WR's will leave without the team retaining one of them?

Honest to god i think right now they keep one of Stallworth or Moss.
If Stallworth performs well, he triggers his lucrative option.

If Moss performs well, he's g-o-n-e. Open market.

Caldwell and Gaffney could certainly be retained, but Gaffney's prospects of making the team this year to begin with are shaky.
pats1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 09:42 AM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
SeanBruschi54's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Bedford, MA
Posts: 3,392
My Mood: Daring
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pats1 View Post
If Stallworth performs well, he triggers his lucrative option.

If Moss performs well, he's g-o-n-e. Open market.

Caldwell and Gaffney could certainly be retained, but Gaffney's prospects of making the team this year to begin with are shaky.
What is Stallworths trigger? I was unaware he had one.
SeanBruschi54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 09:46 AM   #10
Moderator
 
pats1's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,261
Default Re: Chad Jackson: What Th'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanBruschi54 View Post
What is Stallworths trigger? I was unaware he had one.
Not exactly a trigger, but there's a series of lucrative bonuses, starting after this season. So if the Pats want Stallworth to stay around, they'll have to pay those.
pats1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566