mgteich

Let's face it, unless AS is signed to a long-term contract in the next three weeks, we should presume that he is not part of the future.

I think that we need to bring in two top defensive backs: a corner and a free safety. Personally, I do not understand the need for a SS. We have Harrison and Sanders for 2007 and 2008. We have no one at free safety.

I expect a corner, a free safety, a running back and a linebacker in our first four picks. Obviously, I am not at all sure that we will draft a linebacker. Perhaps, we will draft a QB with our 4th pick.

While the order doesn't matter too much, I would hope for a corner in the first round. It also doesn't matter whether we get an ILB, and OLB or a DE tweener. The issue is whether bb can find any Day One player that he expects to contribute in our system. In the past, the answer has been "no". In any case, it could take two years for a drafted linebacker to contribute much.
-----------------------------------

I am absolutely fine with the following secondary going into 2007. It is stronger than the group that we had for the end of the season and in the playoffs. Even understanding that a couple will be injured in 2007, I still expect us to have a better group in this year's playoffs than in last.

Please understand, Hobbs will be playing without a cast. Wilson will be playing. Sanders will continue or improve, as long as we keep him as SS. And we might even get help from the draftees, or even from Andrews.

CORNERS
Hobbs,Scott,Gay,Day One pick

SAFETIES
Wilson,Harrison,Hawkins,Sanders, Day One pick

STER's
Andrews,Mitchell

DW Toys

Cousin,
I respect your opinion.I am not sold on Sanders. He's too small for a SS at 5' 10" and 200 LBS. IMO. He's not a Bob Sanders! Hawkins is at the end. Wilson is definitely going the wrong way and I wish we could keep Harrison healthy and on the field for years....But we can't. I see Rodney as out only real Safety in 2007. Wilson might be better at CB. Sander is a good backup.
A safety is a requirement.
DW Toys

mgteich

My post had us drafting a safety. I expect that we will draft on on Day One. I have us drafting a free safety.

It is not a matter on whether we are sold on Sanders, or whether he one of the best safeties in the league like Bob Sanders. He is an OK and an improving strong safety. Sanders is one of two stroing safeties on the roster for 2007: Harrison and Sanders. BTW, Bob Sanders is 5'8" and weighs 206 pounds.

My point is that the need at Free Safety is much more critical. Here we have Wilson in his last year and Hawkins, who while not "at the end" is a backup for the rest of his career. In any case, Hawkins isn't signed for 2008.

ayjackson

I generally agree with your views MG. I would add though, if we are trading Asante, we'd take two corners on day one - particularly if we received an early 2007 pick as part of the consideration.

signbabybrady

Rodney, Wilson, Hobbs, Scott, Hawkins, Sanders, Gay and anyone else we have is still alot of talent. Yes they are all at various stages in their career and some have injury concerns but that is not a bad group. I think most expect we will add a DB thru the draft so lets not panic. And If we can keep Asante happy we will have as good a secondary as this team has ever had, if we lose asante we will get stronger else where.

__________________

mgteich

I have no issue with drafting an additional corner with the extra pick, if it's there.

spacecrime

Actually, James Sanders is not too small. He's 5'10", 210# and Bob Sanders is 5' 8" and 206.

Not saying James is better than Bob, only that James is not too small.

# 36 James Sanders
Position: SS
Height: 5-10
Weight: 210
Born: 11/11/1983
College: Fresno State
NFL Experience: 3


# 21 Bob Sanders
Position: DB
Height: 5-8
Weight: 206
Born: 02/24/1981
College: Iowa
NFL Experience: 4

Seneschal2

It's entirely possible that CB and Safety were considered need positions prior to the latest Samuel news.

Consider this: What were the odds of signing Samuel from '08 on? If they weren't good, than drafting a CB NOW makes sense. And BB isn't going to suddenly change his CB rankings just because he trades Samuel. If BB's top 3 CBs are ranked in round one, two, and three -- than that won't change. The difference being that assuming the trade nets another day one pick, BB will now have more flexibility to get that CB he wants.

In terms of Safety, Wilson and Sanders are not playmakers, and Rodney's days are limited. If the value and opportunity is there at both SS and FS, BB will draft one of each. Allow time for a player to develop, and when Rodney's ready to hang 'em up in '08, hopefully that '07 prospect will step right in.

You know what happens with expectations.

Value -- that's it. With a Samuel trade, BB will just have another pick to play with, and hopefully net us one of those positions -- but then again -- maybe not.

__________________
"What we want to try to do is maximize each spot on the roster; we want to be stronger at No. 1 than the opponent, stronger at No. 25 than they are, and stronger at No. 53 than they are, we're always looking to upgrade the talent level on the team, and play together to be functional."
- Bill Belichick -

zarakotas5

DWToys,

I have been curious as to your term of endearment towards our fellow posters for some time and cannot help myself from asking from whence it comes?

zarakotas5

Bob Sanders is too small for the way Bob Sanders plays.

After reading a lot of Samuel threads, I really believe the backfield is a bit of an afterthought in the Pats scheme, with more weight given to the safeties, as, after all, they are the "safety". I think they have a system, which Samuel's talent was maximized within, simultaneously because of HIS talent and ability to morph his mentality within, and damn good coaching.

Since we have undeniably made due with relative spare parts, and our situation is near dire, it stands to reason that better talent in the backfield will yield results nothing less than an improvement, eventually...