ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Of course Hobbs is going to get better. He's a second year player, and he played this year with debilitating injuries. Samuel now is just coming into his prime going into his fifth season.
Even if the Pats take a corner with their 24th pick, he's not going to start over Hobbs. If someone really blows, like Duane Starks Hobbs' rookie year, he'll get into the mix by midyear. Otherwise he'll be the nickel, like Cromartie was for San Diego. Corners don't just get plugged in and play at a high level. Safeties, maybe, but corners hit their stride after a few seasons, and Hobbs is just starting to hit his.
He is a young, ****y corner with incredible measurables in every category except height. Despite playing with a fractured wrist he demonstrated ridiculously active hands; you won't find a better corner in the NFL at taking the ball away from the wide receiver. He's a tough son of a ***** and a live hitter, and he's not a primmadonna, taking a midseason "demotion" silently in stride. With all this going for him, he's height is not going to be enough to stop him from being a starting corner for this team. He is not a Ray Mickens.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
You see, the 109 yards is a pretty good figure considering they werent thrown to that often.
They weren't thrown to that often because Hobbs and Samuel provided the coverage necessary for Peyton Manning to look to other options. Unfortunately, the Patriots do not have a linebacker currently on the roster that is able to cover tight end Dallas Clark in single coverage.
I dont think he will get any better, not because of his understanding of the game, but merely he is far outsied in the NFL of today. Thats how I see it. However, as a nickel back, he can hold his own. Just not at the starting corner position.
Quit exaggerating. He is not far outsized in today's NFL. He is an inch shorter than Samuel and Wilson, two inches shorter than Gay and Law. He is the same size as Antoine Winfield. His height is in no way debilitating, especially considering his vertical leap and his outstanding hand-eye coordination.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEM
There were many instances, this season, where other players were inserted into th starting corner position, Mickens,. Scott, etc...and that was AFTER Hobbs came back from his injury. I take that as being a case that the DC, or BB even , was not fully satisfied with Hobbs on the corner. When that occurred, Hobbs was being used as the nickel back.
Those are all VETERAN corners. You won't find a corner back in this league more veteran than Ray Mickens. And why do you take Hobbs coming in as a nickel as a token of dissatisfaction with Hobbs, but don't take the vast preponderance of starts as evidence of competence, even quality? Chad Scott is your prototypical corner. He started twice over Hobbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEM
He is easily faked out, and easily beaten. He gets back and makes it look good for those not in tune with the overall aspect of playing the corner...but his reactions in man to man situations is very weak, and I dont anticipate any improvement. Tie that in with his height disadvantage, even though he has a big vertical leap (that gets him into Pass interference situations, however) he is far too much of a liability on the corner. IMO, he wont be there next season
You're right, he does get back and make it look good. That's called recovery. Good cornerbacks are able to erase their mistakes like that. As time goes on Hobbs will make less and less of those mistakes, and he'll jump the ball more and more, just like Asante Samuel has.
Straight up man to man makes even the best corners look silly some of the time; it is proximate coverage, resorted to only because bodies are needed elsewhere. Hobbs has never embarrassed himself in coverage like Scott or Poteat or Starks or Earthwind Moreland, he's been out there healthy and not, and even in games like Indy when he's stuck to an All-Pro wide receiver, he's never exploited, like our linebackers were by Dallas Clark and Fletcher.
I can't see any reason not to be up on Hobbs. He has, is, and will be getting it done to the satisfaction of Collier, Pees, and Belichick. If there is one person out of our starting four who I am confident will be penciled in next year, its Hobbs. Harrison is old, Wilson is more likely to be upgraded, and Samuel could be gone. I can't see the Pats making a move in free agency, apart from tagging Asante, and they don't pick high enough to pick an absolute stud at the corner position. Hobbs will be there next year, and he'll be a positive. Who do we have that's better? Wilson??
Okay, to the fans of converting a receiver into a full-time DB - we got lucky with Troy. The more I see that guy the more I admire him. I can not believe we thought about cutting him to save a lousy million bucks.... but evidently Troy's deal had to be pushed through by the Krafts themselves, if you believe what the media had to say last year. Troy just keeps doing everything you ask him to then about 10 times more. He turned the tide in the Chargers game, and continues to fill in any where and any time asked.
But enough Troy Brown love for now. The point is, most receivers would make lousy corners. Their ball skills, obviously, are going to be more evolved than your standard corner, and thats where it ends. Who at the combine gives you a scouting report on how well your receiver backpeddles? How about his instincts, and how well his hips swivel when a receiver goes into his break? Come on guys. Fast doesn't cut it. Good hands don't cut it. The object of having a cornerback is not to produce interceptions. If it were, every corner in the league would be a dismal failure. The object is to have receivers covered, and have throws batted down, not made because the man is not open, or intercepted, when a corner is sure about what he is seeing.
Coverage skills are not the same thing as ball skills.
Exactly, and here is where Hobbs fails. His coverage skills are very weak. And, when he does recover, it is too late, as we have seen, and he is often called for pass interference.
By inference, are you placing the blame on the Patriots loss to the Indianapolis Colts squarely on the shoulders of Ellis Hobbs?
That depends on which side they lined up on, of course.
Hobbs didnt have much coverage on either of them...
But,how could they have much yardage when Dallas Clark was the main target for Manning, along with a few receptions by Moorehead and others.
You see, the 109 yards is a pretty good figure considering they werent thrown to that often.
In fact, OTHER receivers accounted for 18 of the 27 completions by Manning, for another 281 yards. Is it possible that Hobbs may have been the cover guy on any of those? My guess is, probably YES.
Hobbs, according to the official NFL gmebook for the game, had only TWO tackles and only ONE pass defended.
So, you see, stats like that can be made to look like whatever you wnt them to look like....until the entire picture is shown.
Nice try though.
They weren't thrown to because they were covered, Einstein. Nice try though.
__________________ Celebrating the wonders of the ignore list.
By inference, are you placing the blame on the Patriots loss to the Indianapolis Colts squarely on the shoulders of Ellis Hobbs?
Or is it McDaniels...or is it BB...or is it...Hobbs. I can't keep track of who NEM is blaming this week.
Incidentally, NEM basically used about 7,000 posts (at least) to rip Charlie Weis for 3 or 4 years.
Weis, the guy who designed and executed offensive game plans for 3 SB winning teams.
Weis, the guy Brady himself credits for his development.
Weis, the guy who has a $21 million buyout clause at Notre Dame.
In the real world, Charlie Weis is a well thought of former NFL assistant and current college head coach. In NEM's world, he's an idiot who "just can't do anything right."
__________________ Celebrating the wonders of the ignore list.
Last edited by SoonerPatriot; 01-28-2007 at 12:24 AM..
Not by Hobbs. Hobbs even blew coverages on Moorehead, too.
YOu have got to be kidding with that comment. Un believable. Is that the best you can do.
Heres some play by play, right from the NFL gamebook.
And, there is alot more, like this, from earlier in the game in which Hobbs was beaten.
Heres the play by play of the winning drive...
THE WINNING DRIVE BY THE COLTS
1-10-IND20 (2:17) (Shotgun) P.Manning pass short left to R.Wayne ran ob at IND 31 for 11 yards. (HOBBS ON THE COVER)
1-10-IND31 (2:12) (Shotgun) P.Manning pass incomplete short middle to B.Fletcher (E.Alexander).
2-10-IND31 (2:08) (Shotgun) P.Manning pass deep left to B.Fletcher ran ob at NE 37 for 32 yards. (AGAIN, HOBSS WAS THE COVER MAN)
-10-NE37 (2:01) (Shotgun) P.Manning pass short middle to R.Wayne to NE 23 for 14 yards (C.Scott, J.Sanders).
PENALTY on NE-T.Banta-Cain, Roughing the Passer, 12 yards, enforced at NE 23.
(On this play, Wayne was on the left side, covered by Hobbs, but when Wayne slanted inside, Hobbs was behind the receiver and Scott (Nickel) and Sanders had to make the stop. Hobbs was badly beaten inside.)
1-10-NE11 (1:53) J.Addai right tackle to NE 6 for 5 yards (M.Wright, M.Vrabel).
2-5-NE6 (1:10) J.Addai up the middle to NE 3 for 3 yards (V.Wilfork).
3-2-NE3 (1:02) J.Addai up the middle for 3 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Also, you mentioned that Harrison was held down...thats true, but he was, for the most part, covered by Samuel, all day long.
On the Samuel interception to the right side, Harrison was the intended receiver.
2-7-IND31 (9:34) (Shotgun) P.Manning pass short right intended for M.Harrison INTERCEPTED by A.Samuel at IND 39. A.Samuel for 39 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
They didnt throw to Harrison as often as they normally had done all season long because they knew that the weak corner was Hobbs, on the other side.
But, do me a favor, dont let these documented facts get in your way of saying that Hobbs did a great job.
NEM. Don't waste your breath. At your age, that's a consideration. Also, Hobbs will be a starting corner for the Patriots next season. Period. You can piss and moan all you want to about Hobbs, but it won't change that fact.
__________________ Celebrating the wonders of the ignore list.
I see, so as usual, the documented game book drive chart doesnt mean anything to you. Figures.
You see, once I decide to get the documented facts, which I dont take the time to do, too often, and that is my fault...but when I do, as I just did, you cant debate them, so you make it personal again.
For the most part, Hobbs was the main culprit in the final drive by Manning. Were there others at fault? Sure, but they picked on Hobbs and he didnt let the Colts down...Manning and the other receivers,not even Harrison, ate Hobbs up alive.
The proof is there for you to see it, but I doubt that you really want to se e anything that substantiates what I have said. Have a nice night.
I see you picked 3 or 4 plays out of dozens. I see you are incapable of putting them into context. I see you being very, very wrong about who is starting at CB for the Patriots next fall.
I see enough, NEM, to know you don't know what you're talking about to the 19,000th power (roughly the number of posts you have here.).
__________________ Celebrating the wonders of the ignore list.
Re: Bigger DB's?
Linear Mode
