ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Apologies in advance for using conventional stats (still getting my feet wet with FO stats). Many examples are cited in this discussion of easy games or easy matchups that might have inflated a team’s ranking. I was looking at SD, BALT, and NE (my opinion of the true contenders) to determine how legit certain stats were. Here are a few things I found:
Games vs. defenses allowing less than 200 yards passing/game:
McNair = 4
Rivers = 5
Brady = 7
Total sacks by defense:
SD 61, BAL 60, NE 44
Games vs. teams allowing 40+ sacks:
SD = 9, BAL = 8, NE 7
Games vs. teams allowing 30 or fewer sacks:
SD = 1, BAL = 3, NE = 5
I realize that it touches upon something that many have discussed, but I found it to be more concise than anything I have read here on the issue. I am sure that SD's pass rush is legit and NE will have to work very hard to stop it, but it is interesting that they faced the most sack friendly schedule by far.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I realize that it touches upon something that many have discussed, but I found it to be more concise than anything I have read here on the issue. I am sure that SD's pass rush is legit and NE will have to work very hard to stop it, but it is interesting that they faced the most sack friendly schedule by far.
Very interesting stats. Especially when you consider that the Patriots are one of the teams that their opponents count in their positive count. I guess that certainly gives some credence to the 'schedule vs schedule' debate, in the Pats favor as far as who is more tested.
I realize that it touches upon something that many have discussed, but I found it to be more concise than anything I have read here on the issue. I am sure that SD's pass rush is legit and NE will have to work very hard to stop it, but it is interesting that they faced the most sack friendly schedule by far.
Just throw that ***** out because they weren't healthy and who you play or how you played this season doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is that the Chargers are healthy this SUNDAY and Brady's record vs the AFC West sucks!!
Get with it - you damn homer!!!!
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait.... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait.... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Just throw that ***** out because they weren't healthy and who you play or how you played this season doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is that the Chargers are healthy this SUNDAY and Brady's record vs the AFC West!!
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait.... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Well why wait for them to show up and ruin a thread. We might as well ruin our own.
I can't remember this many idiots showing up here. Maybe my memory is shot but so far these guys have been the worse I have seen.
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait.... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I realize that it touches upon something that many have discussed, but I found it to be more concise than anything I have read here on the issue. I am sure that SD's pass rush is legit and NE will have to work very hard to stop it, but it is interesting that they faced the most sack friendly schedule by far.
They had 14 sacks in the two Oakland games alone. That pads their sack #s quite a bit. As you said, I am sure they have a good pass rush, but let's not put a bust of it in Canton just yet.
__________________ It's so simple, even a Jets fan could do it.ä To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
They were healthy in 04? Not exactly. I think they set the record for most games missed by starters by a Super Bowl winner.
__________________ It's so simple, even a Jets fan could do it.ä To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.