On to the texans ... - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2006, 11:14 AM   #11
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsDeb's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,203
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: On to the texans ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEM View Post
That has been my pet peeve this season, that changes and adjustments are not made. When something is very apparently not working, it is insanity to keep doing the same thing and expect a different result.

You are right about the no huddle, it should not have waited until halfway through the fourth quarter to be tried.

Against the Texans, at home, I hope we come out very agressively, on BOTH sides of the ball, and go after them early...and not have to keep everyone on the edge of our seats until the fourth quarter in a game that could be decided by one fumble, one interception , etc.

Not to degrade Houston, but they ARE a team that we should beat, especially playing at home.
Well, the fact that they didn't try it until the 4th quarter explains why I don't remember it. In an uncharacteristic move for me, I pretty much stopped watching at the beginning of the 4th quarter when it was clear we were not going to get anything done on offense. If we can't get it together and beat Houston, we might as well start thinking about next year. Hopefully the jettisoning of Gabriel means the team is trying mightily to shake things up and get out of this funk. They've got to get one of these guys going for these last three games (and hopefully beyond) going deep as a threat. Maybe it could be Gafney? What is so disappointing for me is that it is the end of the season and instead of gelling and steadily improving, we seem to be getting worse.
PatsDeb is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 12-13-2006, 11:50 AM   #12
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10
Default Re: On to the texans ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by edgecy View Post
Haven't been keeping track of Mario Williams, how is he working out for you guys?
36 Tackles
4.5 Sacks
1 FR

Mario has been a non-factor for the past five games. He is playing with an injured foot. He is a developing young prospect, and in my opinion he will be a lock at the DE position for the Texans for the next decade. That said, I do not know how much of an effect he will have on this game.

The last time we played the Pats was in Reliant, and we took you guys to OT. I hope that we can have another close game like that.
TracerTrav87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 02:24 PM   #13
In the Starting Line-up
 
Pat the Pats Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Baldwin, MD
Posts: 2,773
My Mood: Busy
Default Re: On to the texans ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TracerTrav87 View Post
The last time we played the Pats was in Reliant, and we took you guys to OT. I hope that we can have another close game like that.
And the last time the Pats played in Reliant, (not against the Texans though), it was a Super game.....
Pat the Pats Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 12:23 PM   #14
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,551
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: On to the texans ...

Any more game talk in and around all the stupid stuff ?

Looks like no Wilfork, but we should be OK for one game. Same with Watson and I am interested to see if Dave Thomas does much in his absence in case Graham leaves as a FA. Maroney - I have no clue about him, I hope he plays so we can start to get a little consistency going with the offense.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 01:22 PM   #15
Rookie
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 48
Default Re: On to the texans ...

Wow, I'm actually quite surprised at how much respect you Pats fans are giving my lowly Texans. I sure appreciate it, but I have to assure you that y'all have absolutely nothing to worry about at all.

Overall, the Texans offense has been absolutely awful. Look for them to dunk pass you to death. Carr has thrown ONE TD pass in the past SEVEN games, dreadful really. Not only that, but he has a propensity of fumbling the ball while getting sacked. He makes terrible decisions and will not throw the ball downfield even if his life depended on it. But I don't know if it's all his fault or if it's the despicable play of the O-line who will "Ole" your defenders right into Carr's face. They can runblock at times, but should you really be concerned about a team with RON DAYNE as the starter? I don't think so.

Andre Johnson is a very good receiver expect when it comes to catching a long pass where he tends to drop a lot of easy receptions. Eric Moulds gets a couple of touches a game, but not nearly enough. Owen Daniels is a very good 4th round pick TE who can block and catch passes, but again he also rarely gets a chance to show what he can do since Carr doesn't scan the field and will instead throw a short pass to the RB's. The Texans only do 3-5 step drops and Carr usually has about half a second to throw before he is ravaged by the defense. Look for your team to come out with about 6 sacks against us unless we decide to run the ball the whole game which is what we did against Oakland after David Carr fumbled the ball THREE possessions in a row.

Defensively, we're a little better. As another Texans poster mentioned, Mario Williams really hasn't done much since he hurt his tootsie. 3 of his 4.5 sacks this year have come from him flopping on the QB that slipped, not an auspicious start for him, especially as the #1 overall pick that the Texans screwed up on. DeMeco Ryans, first pick in round 2, is a stud ball hawk. He's good for 12-15 tackles a game and is always in the right places. Overall though, the DL and linebacking corps leave much to be desired.

The Texans have probably the worst secondary in the NFL. Dunta Robinson is more designed as a free safety, not a #1 CB, he gets burned a lot but hits VERY hard. Our #2 corner is Demarcus Faggins, who got burned by a Mr. Lee Evans from Buffalo a few games ago giving up 2 84-yard TD's in a row. He's been playing a bit better lately, but doesn't really shut anyone down. Glenn Earl, the SS can hit a little but covers like crap and is generally ineffective. Our FS, CC Brown is awful, he can't cover or hit or walk and chew gum at the same time.

Watch out for the special teams, though. Our KR, who I'm sure you'll see a lot of, Jerome Mathis, is FAST and is probably one of the best KR's in the league, he was in the Pro Bowl last year but just came back from injury a couple of weeks ago. PR is Dexter Wynn, who's been doing alright. Chad Stanley, the Punter is dreadful. He's good for the nice 30-yard punts when the team needs to put the opponent deep. He's good at shanking punts too. Kris Brown the kicker has been doing better. Coverage teams on kicks and punts have been excellent this year.

Overally, I look for the Pats to cover the 11.5 point spread easily and paste the Texans. But thank you kind New Englanders for allowing the Texans to step on the same field as y'all. Maybe in a couple of years, the Texans will have a smidgen of a chance, but not '06. But anyways, here's to an injury-free game. I'm sure the Pats are licking their chops for this joke of a team.
DisgracedTexansFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 01:31 PM   #16
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,370
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: On to the texans ...

You haven't watched the Pats-Lions film
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 01:44 PM   #17
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,688
My Mood: Sad
Default Re: On to the texans ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TracerTrav87 View Post
He doesn't lack talent overall, he lacks talent on the line.

As far as WR, the Texans have depth. The only problem is that the O-line doesn't give David Carr enough time to take a breath before he has to get rid of that ball. Get ready to see a lot of quick 3 or 5 step drops followed by dinks and dunks up the field.
Maybe we can trade our WRs for theirs... we will throw in a practice squad punter... and M. Hill...
cstjohn17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 03:03 PM   #18
Rookie
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 48
Default Re: On to the texans ...

I don't know what depth at WR we have. We have Andre Johnson, who is Pro Bowl-bound, and Eric Moulds. After those two it's just Kevin Walter, a FA pickup from Cincy, Jerome Mathis, who never plays WR, and David Anderson who is only on special teams.

We have depth more at TE with Owen Daniels, Jeb Putzier, and Mark Bruener.
DisgracedTexansFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 04:59 PM   #19
In the Starting Line-up
 
shirtsleeve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: stuck at work
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: On to the texans ...

We SHOULD win the battle of the trenches this week, assuming we can assemble enough healthy starters. Objectively, this SHOULD be a two touchdown game and a chance to do some more work on offense, especially on the mental aspects. IF there are no more turnovers, and IF the dumb actual penalties can be eliminated (sorry, but getting your head tripped over after you've been blocked from behind and knocked to the ground is not actually roughing the passer), this SHOULD be a solid win.
shirtsleeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563