The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2006, 02:48 PM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,371
My Mood: Grumpy
Default The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

I'll explain why execution may be indicative of other underlying core problems but first...

1. Had Graham executed by holding onto the ball, an early drive would have continued.
2. Had Gaffney correctly judged the deep ball (similar to 1st year bust Chad Jackson's play) a TD would hav occured. Or at least a gain to the red zone.
3. Had Kevin "what The" Faulk not lost situational awareness and thrown the pass backwards instead of forward, another TD would have occured.

Other lack of execution examples are less straightforward but I believe that our wideouts are not geting free ffom man coverage. Note how close the Miami corners lined up vs our guys 9 yards back, giving the short pass. Brady had no such luxury.

I think that many of the EXECUTION problems are a consequence of lack of talent. Lack of talent at WR to catch the long ball, or to get separation, or to read the blitz and cut the route short in the appropriate time and place. The inability to handle the blitz and fast DEs is another lack of talent issue where the problem gets compounded by forcing a TE to become a OT.

Other execution issues are indicative of poor mental discipline. The numerous offsides and the stupid penalties such as Seymour's roughing calls. Faulk's forward pass was lack of mental discipline as well. Why a formerly disciplined team is now suddenly undisciplined is another deeper question.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 12-11-2006, 02:50 PM   #2
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 136
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

I don't understand why Matt Light wasn't getting help blocking Jason Taylor.

It also seems like they don't run the ball enough.
thomas144 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 02:53 PM   #3
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

I think a symptom of bad coaching and play-calling is an increasing use of the 'poor execution' excuse. If players are not put in positions to succeed, or are too often put in awkward or poorly designed plays, then they will make more mistakes that seem like execution-type errors.

I think McDaniels is too inexperienced as well as unable to cope with non-vanilla defenses, and I also question his 'whiz kid' reputation as an intelligent rising star.
maverick4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:21 PM   #4
SVN
All Pro Poster
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,185
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

getting your offense execute at a high level is also a responsibility of the preperation by the coaching staff in practice..they just dont call plays ...as we have read before..charlie used to berate his players when they didnt practice properly.
SVN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:31 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,371
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

It's a talent and a mental desire issue. If you want to 'blame' the coaches for the mental unpreparedness, there's posssibly some merit there.

Coaching is NOT responsible for inability to get open, inability to hold onto the ball, inability to make a NFL calibre reception, inability to focus enough to avoid throwing across the LOS and inability to maintain composure and avoid stomping an opposing player or gratuituosly roughing the passer.

Coaching called the deep pattern that would have been a TD were the wideout capable of reacting to the ball in flight.

Coaching called the flea flicker style TD play that would have been a TD if Faulk had maintained situational awareness. Two TDs, lost because of lack of execution. Couple that with Watson's drop of the long ball before being hit.

Using additional players to help Light and Kacsur removes thos players from offensive threats allowing tighter coverage of less receivers. Dedicating help to an OT removes a blocker for the surprise opposite side or delayed up the middle blitz. There's a finite limit to schemes compensating for lack of superior talent.

This 2006 team lacks the talent of the 2003 and 2004 teams and I'm not just referring to one missing wideout.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:32 PM   #6
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 8,342
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

isn't execution true of any offense? shouldn't the run and shoot work in theory if it's executed?

i think it is the playcalling and sequence of playcalling. in a matter of 3 plays i've seen them go from the spread formation to the power i formation to trips formation. with all the changing in personnel it's no wodner no chemistry is formed.

IMO the OC is suppose to find a defenses weakness and expolit it. supposedly watson was suppose to create mismatches but he's disappeared the past few weeks.

I will admit they do have personnel issues, the offense has been a mess all season long, establishing no continuity or conistency.
MrBigglesWorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:34 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 
Brownfan80's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Discordia, Stuart FL
Posts: 3,305
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick4 View Post
I think a symptom of bad coaching and play-calling is an increasing use of the 'poor execution' excuse. If players are not put in positions to succeed, or are too often put in awkward or poorly designed plays, then they will make more mistakes that seem like execution-type errors.

I think McDaniels is too inexperienced as well as unable to cope with non-vanilla defenses, and I also question his 'whiz kid' reputation as an intelligent rising star.
Say what you want of Brady's INTs, but players do not FUMBLE because of a playcall. No matter the playcall once the ball is in your arms the concept is the same. These players (not Brady, the non QB fumbles like Graham's) are fumbling our chances away at an alarming rate.

People blame the playcalls over and over, but fundemental football is what is lacking. If you can't hold onto the damn ball how does it even matter what the playcall is? If our WRs can't catch the ball or get open, how can we judge the routes they're asked to run? If our OL can't pass block or run block, how can we judge the playcalls they've been asked to execute?

The OL issues started last season. Some of us thought that it'd get better with the healthy return of Light and Koppen, but this hasn't happened. It's actually gotten worse as this season has gone along. The OL play is horrid.

The tackles in particular are just getting thrown around like utterly worthless ragdolls far too often.

Does it matter if you run a slant or incut or out-route or hitch-n-go if the OTs are letting pressure get to Brady in 1.5 seconds? No!

The playcalling is being restricted by the horrible execution.

Our WRs are playing horrible, our RBs are average without Maroney in there, our OL is playing horribly in both phases of the offense. And just about every skill position player has fumbled in the past four or five weeks. Go back and recount the fumbles in your head. The only player that I can remember not fumbling this season is Troy Brown. Maroney, Dillon, Caldwell, Watson, Graham, Faulk, Gabriel... they've all had ball security problems!

This offense isn't suffereng from slight chips of bad execution, they're suffering from an epedemic of bad execution. They can't even hold the ball once it's in their hands! We're supposed to believe that in spite of that they can run every route the way their supposed to on time and in position? Please!

Brady is surrounded right now with a ton of players that aren't doing what they're supposed to do when they are supposed to do it. He's getting demolished out there by piss-poor protection and the lack of a good running game. Dillon averaged a good bit of yards, but had to come out so often that we still ended up having to punt when we faced short third downs without him in there.

If this team does nothing in the playoffs it will be because the offensive players couldn't come together and play sound fundamental football. Pee-wee stuff. Catch the ball, don't fumble it when you're tackled. Block the man in front of you. It's really that simple. If they can't do the basics, why are we slamming the OC because they're not doing the more elaborate things?

We need more talent.
Brownfan80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:35 PM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 
Oswlek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,389
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

I usually refrain from the OC threads, but I'll bite in this one. I have been quick to point out who was inactive or who was new or whatever in an effort to deflect criticism from McDaniels. The longer the season wears on, though, it becomes clearer just how uncoordinated the offense is. There is a distinct lack of rhythym even during their best of games.

Now, that does not mean that I think that McDaniels is "in over his head" or that he should be fired. He's just not as good as Weis. No shame in that, a lot of good coordinators in this league are not as good as Weis is. The problem arises when NE has personnel issues that require good coordination to overcome. McDaniels just isn't there yet. He may never be.

If Josh is here next year, I will give him my full support until he has proven that improvement is just not there. I feel comforable with BB making the right decision about McDaniels' future with NE. Unless, of course, McDaniels is Ken Walter's illegitimate brother or something,
Oswlek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:38 PM   #9
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 136
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsWickedPissah View Post

Coaching called the flea flicker style TD play that would have been a TD if Faulk had maintained situational awareness.

....

This 2006 team lacks the talent of the 2003 and 2004 teams and I'm not just referring to one missing wideout.
"Situational Awareness?" He made a bad pass.

Yes, the talent is not that great. The stock-piling of offensive linemen hasn't quite worked out the way we thought it would. Come to think of it, the stock-piling of Tight Ends hasn't worked out either.

I think they made a tactical decision to let Matt Light try to block Jason Taylor and it didn't work. I think they should have done something about that.

I also think Brady's receivers aren't very good.
thomas144 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:42 PM   #10
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 8,342
Default Re: The core problem is EXECUTION, not the OC per se

Quote:
Originally Posted by thomas144 View Post
"Situational Awareness?" He made a bad pass.

Yes, the talent is not that great. The stock-piling of offensive linemen hasn't quite worked out the way we thought it would. Come to think of it, the stock-piling of Tight Ends hasn't worked out either.

I think they made a tactical decision to let Matt Light try to block Jason Taylor and it didn't work. I think they should have done something about that.

I also think Brady's receivers aren't very good.
That's assuming it was a double pass. It could've been intended as a pass and reception by brady much like patten did once and brady saw there was nothing so he tried to pass it.
MrBigglesWorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563