skaIownsIyou

i voted no and yes....no we dont need him, but come on, its randy moss...if this was fantasy football now i woudlnt want him lol......but his situation with the raiders....its not like he wanted to be traded to oakland in the first place....from what i remember he wouldve really liked to go to ATL b/c he likes vick and playing with vick woudlve just been too potent of an offense for ATL, in the end i belive oakland just gave them the right price...

DarrylS

I have had this question about Moss, if we were to trade him how would his salary structure impact the rest of our receivers and team? I think he is scheduled to earn 9+ and 11+ millions for the next two years.. he can be called a cancer or whatever, but more basically why do we want to absorb this salary. Right now his salary is probably more than we are paying for all our WR's.. would he restructure his salary to a Patriots type contract?? I don't see his ego making any changes that would be considered friendly to any NFL team.

__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.

FirstAndGoal

I can't answer the poll. Would I take Moss, yes. Would I trade the Pats future for him, no. Just because Oakland sold the farm for magic beans doesn't mean the Pats should do it. If it meant giving close to what Oakland gave for him, the Pats would be nuts. Oakland is in this mess because they've continued to make bad decisions. Look how much they gave up for a guy who's made no impact at all for them. I'm not willing to sell the future for a guy who "could" be a great receiver on the Pats.

Box_O_Rocks

This writer fumbled in the Drew Henson debate
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercu...s/15766625.htm

For a change of pace...

__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

ctpatsfan77

At the moment, it seems to be equally split (45-44) on "I want Moss" v. "I don't want Moss."

FWIW, though, let me say this much: my opposition to Moss is as much in terms of what the Pats would have to give up as anything else. That said, in Belichick I trust, and if he thinks it's a good idea, then who am I to argue?

__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.