Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ClosingTime
|
Just what we need, more posthumous posturing about the Branch saga. It's a dead issue.
For all the junk in the papers about the Patriots 'lowballing' they offered just about the same money that Branch ended up taking from Seattle.
There was a personal vendetta against the ORG by Branch that has been well documented. The only reason he didn't take this supposed 'low ball' offer is because the Patriots wouldn't grant him an out from his current contract, they had written it as an extension to the existing deal without throwing out his final year of his rookie contract. This was a STARTING POINT THAT BRANCH NEVER COUNTERED.
The simple fact is that the Patriots, in order to keep Branch, would have had to not only over pay for the player, but would have also had to allow a player under a 5 year contract to renig on his deal after 4 years. This double whammy is a comprimise that the Patriots should not have given into, and they did not. Short term it will look like a debacle, longterm this was the absolute best possible outcome that the Patriots could have come to.
They couldn't have gotten Deion back regardless, because of his Vendetta over the 5th year. So instead of letting him go out empty handed, they got a first round pick for him, only trading him when they got exactly what they deemed was value enough to unload him.
This over spun story of our cap room and the apparent mis-management by the Patriots brass is silly and overblown.
I can't say that I'm surprised by how bad the article is though, after all it is from Yahoo sports.