Bam back on 53? - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2006, 05:06 PM   #21
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 71
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jefmblrd
I just checked again and haven't seen any mention of this transaction yet.

Also, I would question how much Smith would know about the actual gameplan the Bills have put in for the Patriots given the time frame he was cut in. He would certainly know personnel and some general things but not enough to make much impact.
Exactly. The Bills (like many others in the NFL) think that BB MUST be doing something illegal or underhanded because they just can't believe that anybody could get so much out of so many non-stars. This 7th round pick may have known some general tendencies of the Bills but the game plan is installed during the week before the game. He knew nothing of the particulars.
usmcmgb is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-09-2006, 05:06 PM   #22
Woohoo, I'm a VIP!!!
 
mgcolby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Redskin Country
Posts: 5,205
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

Good one Nem
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait....
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
mgcolby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 05:09 PM   #23
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,800
Blog Entries: 14
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

Quote:
Originally Posted by len_mullen
I think they cut bam, signed smith, signed gabriel, signed bam to the ps, then (if this is true) cut smith. I think the arrival of gabriel was the reason for the release of smith. Action Jackson's performance could also factor in.
Actually Gabriel was signed before Bam was cut...In fact Bam was on teh 53 original...then Smith was brought in and Bam cut...Gabriel was on the team a day or so BEFORE Smith was brought in. Maybe it has to do with injuries...Andrews??? Or maybe he was just NOT good...and one can not even find that transaction...
Pats726 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 05:09 PM   #24
jct
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 851
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

Why is it so hard to believe that BB just thought BAM was better?
Now we have a PS spot open (P Cobbs?)
jct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 05:10 PM   #25
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC via Portland, Maine
Posts: 358
My Mood: Lurking
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jefmblrd
I just checked again and haven't seen any mention of this transaction yet.

Also, I would question how much Smith would know about the actual gameplan the Bills have put in for the Patriots given the time frame he was cut in. He would certainly know personnel and some general things but not enough to make much impact.
I haven't seen anything out there on this either--and totally agree, how much would Smith know anyway?
Mosi Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 05:10 PM   #26
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 658
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

If Smith clears waivers, I bet he takes Bam's spot on the practice squad.
Ahriman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 05:11 PM   #27
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,447
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

The answer could be a lot simpler and more innocent.

BB might have brought Smith in expecting him to compete for the PR role and backup at WR. After a week up close, there could be any number of things to turn him off: work ethic, ability to pick up the offense, hands... hell, even personality.

Bam is a known quantity and a great prospect. Risking losing him to another team by waiving him is not worth a one-week advantage against an inferior opponent. I think BB/SP were hoping for more from Smith, and then didn't see it.
__________________
"We want to build a big, strong, tough, smart, fast, disciplined football team that will consistently compete for a championship."
-- Scott Pioli, from the Patriots scouting manual
rookBoston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 05:12 PM   #28
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,095
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

It isn't all that complicated.

Maroney missed a lot of practice last week. He was one of our KR guys in preseason. We cut a WR who isn't a returner and signed a WR whose value was as a returner. It was an insurance move.

Maroney got healthy, we resigned the guy who catches the ball because we have no use for the returner anymore.

The guy wasn't even there for Buffalo's preparation for the Pats game so he wouldn't help much in that area anyway.
dhamz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 05:13 PM   #29
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,336
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rookBoston
The answer could be a lot simpler and more innocent.

BB might have brought Smith in expecting him to compete for the PR role and backup at WR. After a week up close, there could be any number of things to turn him off: work ethic, ability to pick up the offense, hands... hell, even personality.

Bam is a known quantity and a great prospect. Risking losing him to another team by waiving him is not worth a one-week advantage against an inferior opponent. I think BB/SP were hoping for more from Smith, and then didn't see it.
Amen. It's also possible that he was largely insurance against Willie Andrews being out of action for Sunday, and that Andrews is now ready to go.
patchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 05:15 PM   #30
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,095
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Bam back on 53?

I had forgotten Andrews being banged up as well.

So both KR guys and the PR are hurt and had missed practice in the days before the move was made.

Both got healthy and are good to go so it is obvious to cut Smith and resign Bam who is a better pass catcher than Smith.

Last edited by dhamz; 09-09-2006 at 05:16 PM..
dhamz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC