Why so down on Caldwell? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2006, 01:28 PM   #1
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stuck in Jayhawk country
Posts: 635
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Why so down on Caldwell?

I have rewatched the game and tried to focus as much as I could on Caldwell. I will say that there was some miscommunication between Brady and Caldwell on a couple of occasions and he had one drop right off the pads, but I saw some positive things as well and I think they should be mentioned. I also want to say that he is playing out of position, as he is not ready to be a #1 in any offense, but put in at a #2 I think he would do quite well.
In the first quarter he was able to get some nice seperation and was able to get a long pass interference call on the skins. After that, he did have some miscues and kinda fell off the radar until the 3rd, but he seemed to be handling the jam at the line well.

When Cassel was in Caldwell caught 2 very nice catches on the same drive, showing nice seperation, used his hands well, and was able to keep his feet in bounce on the second catch.

I know that from reports out of camp that we were all expecting Caldwell to come out and be Brady's favorite target and put up huge numbers, and I think he could at the 2 or 3 position. I just think all this talk of him getting cut or cannot catch a ball is overexagerated. Just my 2 cents. I hope this isn't rose colored glasses but more of rational thinking.
midwestpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-28-2006, 01:35 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsDeb's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,203
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

He drops balls thrown right to him; he is tentative on the field; he did not cut off his route and go back towards Brady when Brady was in trouble and therefore the pass fell behind him incomplete on Sat.; with the absence of Branch he has had all of training camp to get his timing down with Brady and hasn't done it. These are the answers off the top of my head.
PatsDeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 01:38 PM   #3
Banned
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,499
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by midwestpatsfan
I also want to say that he is playing out of position, as he is not ready to be a #1 in any offense, but put in at a #2 I think he would do quite well.
Our expectations are certainly raised due to our WR situation this year, I know I'm desperate for him to look good NOW as to ease our minds....but ya still gotta hold on to the damn ball Reche! 2 drops in clutch situations so far, he needs to start making plays.
richpats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 01:44 PM   #4
Practice Squad
 
Displaced - Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ill - Was born and raised in Southboro Mass
Posts: 161
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsDeb
He drops balls thrown right to him; he is tentative on the field; he did not cut off his route and go back towards Brady when Brady was in trouble and therefore the pass fell behind him incomplete on Sat.; with the absence of Branch he has had all of training camp to get his timing down with Brady and hasn't done it. These are the answers off the top of my head.
You expect a new WR to be timing with Brady after only one training camp, sheeesh. I saw him open several times against Washington, just happaned that Watson was also open. I believe the game plan was to get the ball to Watson.

Now don't get me wrong he's no #1, but I believe it will take atleast half the season for them to get on the same page. Geez it took Watson 2 season.
Displaced - Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 01:52 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsDeb's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,203
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced - Fan
You expect a new WR to be timing with Brady after only one training camp, sheeesh. I saw him open several times against Washington, just happaned that Watson was also open. I believe the game plan was to get the ball to Watson.

Now don't get me wrong he's no #1, but I believe it will take atleast half the season for them to get on the same page. Geez it took Watson 2 season.
Watson was a rookie who missed virtually all of his first season. Caldwell is a vet who was disappointing in his last assignment with San Diego.
PatsDeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 01:52 PM   #6
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,350
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

Okay, guys, we get it - Caldwell's success in practice has not yet translated to the field. We're thin at WR and he's not stepping up. We're disappointed. But the guy could be a perfectly capable #3, possibly a #2 once he has the system in his bones. Give it a bit more time. I think, if healthy, he could be somewhere between Andre Davis and David Givens, which would be fine with me.
patsox23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 02:14 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,623
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

[QUOTE=midwestpatsfan] I also want to say that he is playing out of position, as he is not ready to be a #1 in any offense, but put in at a #2 I think he would do quite well.
QUOTE]

I don't think that there is a position called "Number One Wide Receiver." #1, #2, etc. are just informal designations made by fans to distinguish certain receivers as being better than others. This designation is also used as a qualitative statement - i.e., #1's have attributes a,b,c...etc. However, by no means do #1's line up in different positions, run different routes, catch different types of passes, etc. If they happen to be dominant players, they might face different coverage schemes than less gifted players, but the bottom line is: "#1 receiver" is not a position. If you are saying, he's not ready for the pressure of being featured, then I don't think it will make a difference what option he is - if he is that fragile psychologically, he will not be effective. Bottom line, the TD he dropped against Atlanta is a catch that a NFL receiver has to make, whether he is a "#1" or a "#5".
letekro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 02:34 PM   #8
Practice Squad
 
Displaced - Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ill - Was born and raised in Southboro Mass
Posts: 161
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsDeb
Watson was a rookie who missed virtually all of his first season. Caldwell is a vet who was disappointing in his last assignment with San Diego.
True, but it still took him all of last season to be on the same page as Brady.
Vet or not, Caldwell is still playing with a new QB in a new system. I guess all I'm saying is I'll give him some more time. That's just MHI.
Displaced - Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 02:39 PM   #9
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsDeb
He drops balls thrown right to him; he is tentative on the field; he did not cut off his route and go back towards Brady when Brady was in trouble and therefore the pass fell behind him incomplete on Sat.; with the absence of Branch he has had all of training camp to get his timing down with Brady and hasn't done it. These are the answers off the top of my head.
So, because you erroneously think that players can develop timing and a rapport in 20-30 practice sessions, that makes Caldwell bad? Also, you seem to forget that Caldwell is learning a new play-book. That doesn't happen over-night.

Caldwell, as long as he's not the #1, should be good for the Pats. If we have to rely on him to be the #1, then our expectations will need to be tempered by the understanding that he is returning from ACL injury, he's in a new system, and he's developing his rapport with Brady.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 02:47 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: Why so down on Caldwell?

The fact remains you do have to catch the ball and run the right routes and know where to line up to play any level of WR in this league. For a guy who has been in the league for 4 seasons he is a marginal talent (weak #2 or 3 option at best).

That said, I warned at the outset of camp, when so many here were dismissive of Branch's holdout (the he and Brady are fine and he doesn't play the pre season anyway crowd) that his absence was already impacting the rest of the unit. BB said pretty much the same thing a few weeks ago when asked a general question about guys returning from injury (or whatever...) and how much time do they need to be game ready. His answer was it's not just about them being ready it's about getting on the same page with everyone else in their unit.

Guys are practicing their routes and Branch's because he isn't here. Mentally Troy can do that because he knows the offense and Brady inside out and many of those routes used to be his. But eventually it will take a toll on him physically. New guys like Caldwell and Jackson (who has become part of the problem now as opposed to part of the solution) can't handle the mental aspect of double duty in a new offense. Bethel struggled with that and it was one reason he wore out his welcome - he felt it was an imposition to expect him to cover for injured receivers and learn their routes too.

And as Deion would say, when and if he comes back it doesn't just instantly get easier for everyone because most of them have never played with him and now they are back to getting reps they were shortchanged on all offseason because they were trying to cover for his absent ass while learning a whole new offense with a meticulous QB at the helm.

It's not all about Deion. Or even Deion and Brady. It's about everybody on the offense who will all be impacted by his absence and/or his presence.
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563