The Core 46 - Do We NEED More? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2006, 08:28 AM   #1
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,112
Default The Core 46 - Do We NEED More?

Arguably these 46 are all we need to play and win. One spot is for Branch or for whoever Pioli brings in if Branch is still out for Game Two. This core includes solid backups at all positions.

7 roster spots, plus the Practice Squad, plus the Shadow Roster are left.
------------------------------------------------------
Q1) Are there any other positions that are critical?

Q2) Are there any other players that are "must keeps"?

Q3) Are there any other positions that MUST be filled, or should we feel free to keep developmental players that will be inactive? What is the priority for the last 7 positions?

Q4) Please give your last seven and make a case for them being on the roster instead of being cut (hoping that they make the Shadow Roster) or cut (and hoping they make the Practice Squad).
-------------------------------------------------------

Offense - 20

2 QB Brady, Cassel
3 RB Dillon, Moroney, Faulk
4 TE Graham, Watson, Thomas, Mills
4 WR Jackson, Brown, Caldwell, Branch/fa
7 OL Light, Mankins, Koppen, Neal, Kaczur, O'Callaghan, Hochstein

Defense - 20

2 DT Wilfork, Sullivan
4 DE Seymour, Warren, Green, Wright
3 OLB Vrabel, Colvin, Banta-Cain
3 ILB Bruschi, Seau, Gardner
4 CB Samuel, Hobbs, Gay, C. Scott
4 S Harrison, Wilson, Hawkins, Sanders

Specialists and Special Teams - 6
1 K Gostkowski
1 P Miller
1 LS Paxton
3 ST-D Izzo, Davis, Andrews

Last edited by mgteich; 08-28-2006 at 08:36 AM..
mgteich is online now   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-28-2006, 08:34 AM   #2
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,437
Default Re: The Core 46 - Do We NEED More?

I would add these 7:

Childress (is a Troy Brown in waiting);
Woods (He's got more of 'it' than Mincey right now);
Alexander (Can spell Seau, and is a Turnover making machine I think)
Klecko (only if he's healthy, is almost unblockable as a pass rusher, backup for Green)
Cobbs (because I never want another Amos Zeroue (sp?) disaster)
Tebucky (only if he's healthy, I think he's a gamer and has good chemistry with the team)
Poteat (he's been there for us in the past, and he's much more a Patriot than Warfield)

Last edited by QB12; 08-28-2006 at 08:43 AM..
QB12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 08:38 AM   #3
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 825
Default Re: The Core 46 - Do We NEED More?

Last 6:

Either Cobbs or Evans - purely and simply for the depth, look what happened last year

Childress (possibly Stone if he does better) - he can return kicks, and is solid as a 5th receiver, again extra depth, i feel like keeping only 4 isn't enough when sometimes we go with 4 WR sets

Stevenson or Britt - again just more depth, i am not comfortable having only 2 backup lineman for the year, if we lose light and koppen like last year, then there is no one, granted either could make it to the PS, but they certainly would merit a spot

Mincey or Woods - whoever wins the battle between the two, more LB depth, youth infusion, they have looked solid

Alexander - IMO he has looked very solid, he's been in the system for a few years, i think he will be good

Andrews - DB/WR/ST, extremely fast, extremely versatile
tatepatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 08:42 AM   #4
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 825
Default Re: The Core 46 - Do We NEED More?

Sorry I just realized I have two more spots, one I left out and the other because I didn't see Andrews listed at ST


I'll take Tebucky if healthy - experienced and great depth

I think it has to be Klecko or Hill, one more D-lineman
tatepatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 01:20 PM   #5
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,320
Default Re: The Core 46 - Do We NEED More?

I really like this bottom-up approach.

My picks:

Childress -- 2 of your 4 WRs have essentially no TC reps, and all of the 4 have to be considered at least moderate injury risks.

Alexander -- the most impressive ST player of this camp, and this is his 3rd year in the system as an LB.

Woods -- Has shown good effort and burst, was an ST standout in college and is probably a little ahead of Mincey in the learning curve thanks to more experience at the position.

Cobbs -- 3 RBs dress for each game. It only takes one injury to put a reserve on the active list, and Cobbs has earned it.

Britt -- need another lineman. Britt & Stevenson are both worthy but given a tossup I'll take the tackle. If Koppen isn't truly ready to go, I reconsider.

Jones/G. Scott (whoever's healthiest) -- both gunners who have some value at safety. With Wilson's flexibility to CB, this adds functional depth to both positions.

Smith/Mincey -- this is a tough one. I'm leaning Smith because I suspect he's a little more ready. IF you really like both kids and IF you feel that Alexander is ready to be an ST leader, just maybe you keep both and lose one of your veteran ST guys.
patchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 02:27 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,112
Default Re: The Core 46 - Do We NEED More?

AUGUST 28 GUESSES FOR THE END OF THE BENCH

I really like the 46 man roster. Pioli must sign Branch or a replacement wideout to complete the 46.
----------------------------------------------------
The last seven could come at any position and could certainly come from free agency. My analysis and guesses are below.

#47 EVANS I think he is competing with Pass, not Cobbs, He is a Ster, and blocker, and as a bonus he can carry the ball.

#48 BRITT I too take the OT. I like having Kaczur, Hochstein and Britt as my backups, with Stevenson and Hand on the Practice Squad.

#49 CHILDRESS I don't particularly like him, and I think we may replace him from free agency, but he has the spot for now. Stone and Musinski both have shown something but not enough. This spot could be Stone's, since he was ahead on depth chart before being injured, and is now healthy.

#50 ALEXANDER I've got him back on the roster again as a STer who is beating out Beisel (the alternative for this ST spot). This spot is another one a free agent could easily fill. I'm fine with Jones or Guss Scott as a better choice, but I fear both are hurt, and will not be back for awhile.

#51 CHAD BROWN He might be on IR tomorrow, we'll see; but we need another OLB, and I favor the experience. Woods could take this spot, but the Practice Squad seems more likely; ditto for Mincey.

#52 POTEAT over Warfield I think people forget the injury risk. Better to be safe with a known quantity. After all, he was our nickel for most of the end of the year, on a pretty good defense. If Gay is your nickel, how far ahead of Poteat do you think Gay is?

#53 And coming around the rail, back in practice today, the longshot, the injured, MARQUIS HILL. Seriously, the question is whether to give Klecko or Hill one more year or pick up a jag off the slagheap of free agency.
----------------
Well, I said it could be anyone for the bottom three. Does anyone else have Brown, Poteat and Hill? Now, that's creativity! or something else.
mgteich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 02:33 PM   #7
I can delete my own crap!
 
Lloyd_Christmas's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,405
Blog Entries: 1
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: The Core 46 - Do We NEED More?

I don't see Gardener, Izzo, and Chad Scott as core players. Other than that, your core list looks good to me.
Lloyd_Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 02:38 PM   #8
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,112
Default Re: The Core 46 - Do We NEED More?

I just depends on how important you consider special teams. All three are critical Ster's. Also, with Bruschi back, and presumably Vrabel back outside, Gardner is in the ILB rotation. If Vrabel is still inside, then we are missing a backup OLB core player (Gardner is not core). The only one I would call that is a healthy Chad Brown. Anyway, that's my reasoning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd_Christmas
I don't see Gardener, Izzo, and Chad Scott as core players. Other than that, your core list looks good to me.
mgteich is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563