Oline depth - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2006, 06:14 PM   #1
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,116
Default Oline depth

I reviewed the play of the Pats O-line in the third and fourth quarters, to see what the play of the others beside the starters looked like.

Kaczur did not play. Britt was at LOT, Yates at LOG, Hochstein played Center until Stevenson and eventually Barthelmes got some snaps. Mrucz played ROG and Hand played ROT.

This was somewhat surprising since I had seen Mrucz at LOG, and Yates at ROG in earlier games. I guess the coaches wanted to evaluate them on the opposite sides.

All of Cobbs runs, except his big one came over the blocking of Britt and Yates. Barthelmes and Stevenson didn't do much but weren't overwhelmed either. Mostly it was stalemate with these guys. OTOH, Britt and to a lesser extent Yates and Mrucz got movement on their blocks and played the game on the defenses side of the LOS.

Hand looks raw but he has some power.

Off the play review, I would say Britt is the swing LOT; Yates may be slightly ahead of Mrucz at guard,but its close.

I would think off this second half, that Britt is the #4 tackle (and a near starting talent, and swings at both LOT and ROT.
Kaczur is a ??
Koppens and Hochstein are the third and fourth interior linemen, after Mankins ands Neal.

And then Yates and/or Mrucz fill out the Oline depending on whether the Patriots carry nine or ten Offensive linemen on the 53.

Regarding the PS, Hand looks best, then Stevenson, and finally Barthelmes. But I wasn't really impressed with any of them. If Steitz played, I didn't notice him.
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-27-2006, 06:24 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Oline depth

Light/(Kaczur)/Britt
Mankins/Yates
Koppen/Hochstein
Neal/Mruc
Kaczur/OCallaghan

seems deep enough to me with Stevenson on PS
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 06:35 PM   #3
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,148
Default Re: Oline depth

Focused film reviews are SO rewarding.

I've also had it precisely the way you do ... except that i gave Mruc the nod over Yates.
Now i'm back to neutral on that.

For reasons having nothing to do with the O-line ... but falling out from the D-line ...
i now expect Stevenson to make the p/s ... but not Steitz.
(Before this game, i had them both.)

But the ascension of Sullivan's star ... would seem to push Thomas back onto the p/s,
where he joins LeKevin Smith.

In my book, that makes 8 ...
leaving no room for Steitz.

We'll see soon.
__________________
- - - Leading the division by 2+ games - - -
flutie2phelan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 06:52 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,136
Default Re: Oline depth

I don't think we need 10 OL's. Almost all rosters have had eight, although some have 9 and some 7. Very few have 10 or 11.

I have O'Callaghan starting with Hoch, Kaczur and Britt as backups. That's plenty. After all, only seven will be active. If there are injuries, a player can be brought up from the Practice Squad which will likely have Stevenson and Hand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Around_Brown
Light/(Kaczur)/Britt
Mankins/Yates
Koppen/Hochstein
Neal/Mruc
Kaczur/OCallaghan

seems deep enough to me with Stevenson on PS
mgteich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 10:31 AM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Oline depth

The pressure to carry 8 or 9 OL is coming from the LB corps as far as I can see. If your reserves are Hochstein, Kaczur, and Brit, you have Kaczur who has shown an ability to play either G or T spot to create versatility to go with Hochstein's C/G/LS/TE role. Mruczkowski seems to have the edge on Yates with his C playing time for a possible 9th slot, especially if Kaczur needs a little more time to return to full strength.

Stevenson and Hand are ahead for the Practice Squad. Steitz in my mind was tied with Stevenson, but it has taken him longer (kicking around the league, NFLE) to get to the same place, suggesting Stevenson has the greater upside.

Mruc getting cut is likely signed by Cleveland to compete for a C spot. I think Yates doesn't last long on the shadow roster either - not with Green Bay starting two rookies and the NYJ and Bills in rebuilding mode.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 11:38 AM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
All_Around_Brown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,098
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Oline depth

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich
I don't think we need 10 OL's. Almost all rosters have had eight, although some have 9 and some 7. Very few have 10 or 11.

I have O'Callaghan starting with Hoch, Kaczur and Britt as backups. That's plenty. After all, only seven will be active. If there are injuries, a player can be brought up from the Practice Squad which will likely have Stevenson and Hand.
You are probably spot on.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All_Around_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC