08-17-2006, 10:09 PM
|
#9
|
|
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 5,072
|
Re: NFL Total Access: Schefter reports on Branch..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pats726
The Pats may fine him..so he'll be playing for little money this year...I also think if he does that, teams may realize he is trouble..does anyone know of a player sitting out like that and how his FA was a few months later??? My gut tells me he does it and is inative the rest of the year..OR..is IRed...GONE!! Franchise?? Why?? He doesn't wish to play here...so??
|
Because the teams needs to show that throwing a tantrum will not be rewarding to their players. If he goes somewhere else and signs for big money after not honoring his contract then he wins. The team needs to send the message that a contract is LEGALLY BINDING, and its entire purpose is to ensure that regardless of future situations, THIS IS GOING TO BE WHAT HAPPENS, not this is going to be what happens if you feel like it.
Contracts are becoming totally pointless and jokes in the NFL as a player can not honor them if they don't feel like it, with relatively little consequences. If a team cuts a player he has to recieve the remainder pre-determined guaranteed money. What if a team cut a player and said "we think you were overpaid based on your performance, so we don't feel like payinig you the rest of this moeny that we both previously agreed we would." I don't understand why the franchise must honor the contract, at least in terms of payment of guaranteed money, but players don't have to honor them in terms of guaranteed years.
__________________
"What Tom Brady just did gives me goose bumps."-John Madden after final drive in SB 36
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Unofficial Kevin Faulk supporter.
Last edited by zippo59; 08-17-2006 at 10:13 PM..
|
|
|