PFT: Chayut Pulling A Poston? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2006, 02:34 PM   #1
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
DefenseRules's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,679
My Mood: Grumpy
Default PFT: Chayut Pulling A Poston?

http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm

Quote:
CHAYUT PULLING A POSTON?

In his ongoing quest to get the New England Patriots to overlook the fact that receiver Deion Branch is under contract for the 2006 season, agent Jason Chayut could be treading dangerously close to the edge of a potentially steep cliff.

Chayut insists that it wasn't proper for the Pats to present Branch with a five-year contract as a second-round rookie in 2002. Ignoring the fact that his own firm later allowed a second-round pick to sign a five-year contract in 2003, 2004, and 2005, Chayut has claimed that Branch was "exploited" by the team.

More specifically, Chayut claims that there was an agreement in principle on a four-year deal, and that the team reneged. Mike Reiss of the Boston Globe (who unlike his colleague Ron Borges isn't in the tank for Branch and Chayut) points out that Chayut didn't file a grievance after the Pats supposedly breached the agreement by yanking the deal.

Our guess? There never was a deal in principle, and Chayut is throwing mud now in order to justify his position that Branch should be an unrestricted free agent. But if the NFLPA considers these facts through in conjunction with the regulations regarding agents, the union might conclude that Chayut's failure to take action after the Pats failed to honor the agreement in principle could be something for which Chayut should be disciplined.

Indeed, it was Carl Poston's ridiculous suggestion that the Redskins had yanked a second $6.5 million roster bonus from the final draft of LaVar Arrington's December 2003 contract extension that resulted in Poston's bookended two-year suspensions. In order to make the argument fly that the 'Skins had screwed Arrington, Poston had to admit that he didn't read the final draft of the contract.

Chayut faces a similar problem. In arguing now that the Pats engaged in bad-faith conduct four-plus years ago, Chayut implicitly concedes that he did nothing at all about it.

Oops.

Meanwhile, the more we learn about the offer Chayut spurned, the more confused we are by Chayut's decision not to have Branch sign it. The extension pays $6.25 million per year on the three new seasons, and $8 million in guaranteed money. Plus, Branch would be on the open market come 2010, unlike Reggie Wayne, who is tied up until March 2012. And he'd get paid without having to complete the 2006 season free from serious injury.

Last edited by DefenseRules; 08-05-2006 at 02:34 PM..
DefenseRules is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-05-2006, 02:41 PM   #2
Virtual Internet Person
 
PromisedLand's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,360
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: PFT: Chayut Pulling A Poston?

This is starting to look ugly. Agents suck.
__________________
It's so simple, even a Jets fan could do it.ä
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

PromisedLand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 02:58 PM   #3
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
smg93's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,744
Default Re: PFT: Chayut Pulling A Poston?

Agent's might suck, but ultimately it's Deion's call. The more I read about the supposed offer, the more it looks to me like Deion's headed the Ty Law way. That's too bad.
smg93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 03:02 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: PFT: Chayut Pulling A Poston?

This is already being well covered and discussed in today's Branch thread...
Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2006, 03:05 PM   #5
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
DefenseRules's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,679
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: PFT: Chayut Pulling A Poston?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks
This is already being well covered and discussed in today's Branch thread...
Reiss Weights in on Branch - No Contract Contact Since May
Ah Jeez, I'm sorry man. I didn't even think to look there. My appologies.
DefenseRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC