ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I'm wondering if anyone has seen any passing formations so far in training camp using three or four tight ends. Imagine a version of the spread with Graham, Thomas, Mills and Watson on the field. Why not? With four highly capable receivers at this position, what exotic combinations might BB have in mind? Also, is Mills lining up at tight end most of the time or is he in the backfield as well? It's because of this bunch that I'm not as worried about wide receiver depth.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Three- and four-tight end sets in passing game?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan
My "why not" is that it would keep the most athletic receivers we have (Branch, Caldwell, Jackson) standing on the sidelines.
It would mess with the minds of opposing defenders. And also might be the ticket for certain down-and-distance scenarios (red zone?). All our tight ends are pretty athletic for that matter; Graham and Watson not only are big and strong, they can get downfield in a hurry.
Re: Three- and four-tight end sets in passing game?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tunescribe
I'm wondering if anyone has seen any passing formations so far in training camp using three or four tight ends. Imagine a version of the spread with Graham, Thomas, Mills and Watson on the field. Why not? With four highly capable receivers at this position, what exotic combinations might BB have in mind? Also, is Mills lining up at tight end most of the time or is he in the backfield as well? It's because of this bunch that I'm not as worried about wide receiver depth.
Goal line offense:
Graham on the left
Vrabel on the right
Watson split wide
Thomas in motion
Mills in the backfield
Re: Three- and four-tight end sets in passing game?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tunescribe
It would mess with the minds of opposing defenders. And also might be the ticket for certain down-and-distance scenarios. All our tight ends are pretty athletic for that matter; Graham and Watson not only are big and strong, they can get downfield in a hurry.
I would have no problem with it on occasion and in certain situations but I wouldn't want to see it in many situations, especially 3rd and long which is when we usually have 3 and 4 receivers.
Re: Three- and four-tight end sets in passing game?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tunescribe
I'm wondering if anyone has seen any passing formations so far in training camp using three or four tight ends. Imagine a version of the spread with Graham, Thomas, Mills and Watson on the field. Why not? With four highly capable receivers at this position, what exotic combinations might BB have in mind? Also, is Mills lining up at tight end most of the time or is he in the backfield as well? It's because of this bunch that I'm not as worried about wide receiver depth.
No, Graham and Mills are PUP.
I did see Maroney in the backfield and Corey split out way wide on 2 occassions.If I were a DC that would give me a migraine.
__________________
Felger started his question, "Correct me if I'm wrong," BB quickly interjected, "I can't wait--"
``The officials now are evaluating the players and their performance, I mean, that's great,'' Belichick deadpanned. ``I can't say how much that means to me, really.''
Re: Three- and four-tight end sets in passing game?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecrime
Goal line offense:
Graham on the left
Vrabel on the right
Watson split wide
Thomas in motion
Mills in the backfield
whoo hoo
Since the goalline is most likely going to be a running play, I'd much rather have a Pass, or !gasp! Seymour or !gasp!!gasp! Klecko back there for lead blocking.
Re: Three- and four-tight end sets in passing game?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecrime
Goal line offense:
Graham on the left
Vrabel on the right
Watson split wide
Thomas in motion
Mills in the backfield
whoo hoo
I agree with Tunescribe that a QB sneak would be a likely conclusion for such a lineup. . . . either that or a pass to Vrabel. [How do you think the JEST LBs feel about letting him get open twice last year?]
BTW--don't you mean this?
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.