Draft Weekend thoughts - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2006, 10:43 AM   #11
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,354
Default

Jeremy Mincey, OLB. Belichick even said so - with a degree of certainty that he seems NEVER to use when it comes to draft picks. "Mincey will be a OLB for us."
patsox23 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-02-2006, 12:19 PM   #12
Patriots Salary Cap Guru
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,472
My Mood: Happy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd_Christmas
5) If your point was that compensatory picks do not really make up for losing a good player, then I agree.
I think that you said my point better than I did.
__________________
My youngest sister's best friend is on the board of directors of a food pantry in Malden, Massachusetts that distributed 285,000 meals and meal equivalents in 2005. I am asking that if you have found my salary cap pages useful that if you are able to do so, please make a donation to it. Please contact me for more information.
Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:21 PM   #13
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Poplar Hill, Baltimore, MD
Posts: 462
My Mood: Bored
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJDChE
We have a lot of players in our secondary.

CB: Samuel, Hobbs, Gay, Warfield, CScott, Poteat
S: Harrison, Wilson, Sanders, Tebucky, Mitchell, GScott, Ventrone

I just don't see a lot of room for rookies in there. Of course, everyone wants to see us draft some young stud safety to take over for Harrison when he's done, but I just don't see that as a necessity. I like the secondary we have.

Warfield did a pretty respectable job filling in at safety last year, and Chad Scott can step into that role too. I just think we have a lot of versatile talent in our DBackfield. It's not the youngest out there, which is one reason why you could knock them for not getting a DB earlier, but they may think they have a young guy on the roster now that will be able to take over for Harrison. Ventrone? I've heard good things about him.
Just to be accurate, I think you mean Hawkins when you talk about Warfield, who wasn't on the Pats last year.

Also, you omitted Hawkins from your DB list.
__________________
Troy Brown for Pro Football Hall of Fame
cubedoggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:37 PM   #14
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 222
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel
I think that you said my point better than I did.
The point is well-taken but you've eliminated the third variable: Cap implications.

While using a 4th round pick to replace AV and a 3rd round pick to replace Givens, you do take a step backwards in terms of draft pick value when factoring the compensitory picks. However, you've also presumably freed up a ton of cap space at the same time. So the equation is really the salary difference between Jackson and Gotkowski vs. AV and Givens, as well as the opportunity to address other positions at those picks.

Given the high cap numbers that we would have incurred at Kicker and #2 WR, I still think that this was the wisest course of action.
Mooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:40 PM   #15
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,421
My Mood: Fine
Default

There seems to be a consensus developing that D Graham will be gone. IMO BB regards him a a 'core' player like a Bruschi or Seymour. I don't think he will be going to another team. He is as well rounded a TE as I have seen. Some TE are used as receivers, Graham can fill that role but he is also an outstanding blocker, who sacrifices stats to give the team a better chance to win. I have never heard word one from this guy about not getting enough balls thrown his way. He works hard every play does his assignments well. IMO BB is not letting this guy go, till he is past his prime a la AV and Willie this year.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:43 PM   #16
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
kolbitr's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston more or less
Posts: 653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel
...read Rich Gosselin's draft-related articles...2.) The Steelers, the defending SB champs, helped themselves a great deal. ...4.) Given the track record of rookie wideouts and Florida wideouts, I do not expect Jackson to perform as a top #2 until the latter half of the 2007 season. ...8.) If Graham wants to be the #1 TE in a team's offense, then this year will be his last as a Patriot...
Indeed, Gosselin is a real font of information. I agree with the posters who have suggested that the Meyer-regime has struck Belichick as different enough from previous ones at UF to take a chance on this kid, despite the very poor record of the receivers from UF in the past. The fact that he has shown versatility in his position is very encouraging. And the timeline sounds pretty good, although I hallucinate that he will show real flashes this year, and be #2 in training camp next year...a bit ahead of schedule.

Does anyone think that Graham has the ability to be a #1 receiving tight end, a la Sharpe, Gates, or even Shockey? He seems to bring numerous skills but has yet to shine...I wonder if anyone would see him as the answer. Interesting line of thought, though.
kolbitr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:55 PM   #17
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan13
There seems to be a consensus developing that D Graham will be gone. IMO BB regards him a a 'core' player like a Bruschi or Seymour. I don't think he will be going to another team. He is as well rounded a TE as I have seen. Some TE are used as receivers, Graham can fill that role but he is also an outstanding blocker, who sacrifices stats to give the team a better chance to win. I have never heard word one from this guy about not getting enough balls thrown his way. He works hard every play does his assignments well. IMO BB is not letting this guy go, till he is past his prime a la AV and Willie this year.
I'm not sure you can say BB won't let him go. First, he could simply not sign with the Pats. Second, he could get a marginally better offer and not give the Pats a chance to match, like the Vinitraitor, Third, he could want more money that the Pats were willing to spend on that position, no matter how much they wanted him (like Givens)
spacecrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:56 PM   #18
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kolbitr
Indeed, Gosselin is a real font of information. I agree with the posters who have suggested that the Meyer-regime has struck Belichick as different enough from previous ones at UF to take a chance on this kid, despite the very poor record of the receivers from UF in the past. The fact that he has shown versatility in his position is very encouraging. And the timeline sounds pretty good, although I hallucinate that he will show real flashes this year, and be #2 in training camp next year...a bit ahead of schedule.

Does anyone think that Graham has the ability to be a #1 receiving tight end, a la Sharpe, Gates, or even Shockey? He seems to bring numerous skills but has yet to shine...I wonder if anyone would see him as the answer. Interesting line of thought, though.

It's been mentioned in previous posts that the entire offense was designed around Graham in college, so there's no doubt in my mind that he has the potential to be a #1 receiving tight end.
chowder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:57 PM   #19
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd_Christmas
5) If your point was that compensatory picks do not really make up for losing a good player, then I agree.
Me, too. The pick helps a little, and takes some of the sting away, but if you could do better by losing your FAs than by signing then, no one would sign their FAs
spacecrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 04:23 PM   #20
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecrime
Me, too. The pick helps a little, and takes some of the sting away, but if you could do better by losing your FAs than by signing then, no one would sign their FAs
I agree, and what's more I think everyone agrees -- this seems like something of a straw-man argument. Does anybody think the Pats intentionally let valuable players walk because they're champing at the bit for an extra 6th rounder? Comp picks don't even start until the end of day 1, so they obviously don't "make up for" the loss of a top contributor.

A question: do FA signings count in the comp offset equation if they don't make the team? The only time I could see comp picks tilting the decision would be in signing a JAG vet as camp fodder. If you really didn't expect the guy to make the team and his signing could cost you a low-round pick, you might pass.
patchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC