Musings - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2006, 01:41 AM   #1
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
PATRIOTS-80's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,784
Default Musings

It seems the common consensus on the board is that Vrabel moves to OLB. I think that it is possible, perhaps even probable, but for the sake of argument, lets look at it from the "mike position."

Ted Johnson played the mike position in the 3-4 defense. As the mike, TJ took on the guards. It would seem he played it so well that he cracked some guys helmet, and had to retire with concussions.

Obviously our 266 lb Vrabel played it very well, so the 64,000 dollar question is who plays the Mike if Vrabel moves outside.

Scenario A

Bruschi and Beisel

There is no way that Beisel will ever be confused as a Mike. Unless he reports to camp with a lot more weight, he can't play that position.

Scenario B

Bruschi and Claridge

Possible. At 259 lb Claridge does have the necessary weight to play the position.

Scenario C

Bruschi and Roach

Roach obviously has no chance at breaking into the starting lineup, but he is a protypical Mike.
http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/sco...ddieroach.html

Thus, it can clearly be seen that if Vrabel moves out, as of now Claridge (our 5th round pick last year) probably will break the starting lineup as the Mike. Roach (like Randall Gay that one year), has an decent chance of making the 53 as the backup mike.
Beisel on the other hand, has a well-defined role as Bruschi's back-up, and as pass-covering LB who can sub out the Mike (see Roman Phifer).

Obviously Vrabel is the best player available to play Mike.

If Vrabel stays inside, our ILB depth chart looks like this:

Bruschi ............... Vrabel
Beisel ............... Claridge
Alexander ............... Roach


Our OLB would be:

Colvin ............. TBC or Claridge
Mincey .............. Claridge or TBC

Can TBC or Claridge man the outside position? As long as he sets the edge, doesn't try to do too much, forces everything back-up the middle, we'll be fine.

Conclusion #1, if Vrabel goes outside, Claridge starts. If Vrabel stays inside, TBC and Claridge could battle for the outside position. Winner gets the spot, the loser stays on the bench.

Conclusion #2, Roach (a projected 4th round pick) has the best shot of making the squad as UDFA, as Randall Gay did that year when he made the squad.

If I remember, we cut T. Buckley that year our depth chart looked like this:
Law, Poole, Samuels, Gay

Law and Poole got hurt, and Samuels and Gay were our starters in the Super Bowl

Edit: also BTW, Alexander weighs almost exactly the same as Beisel. Unless either of them put on significant weight, both of them cannot play the running down "mike" position.

Also, much of my musings is based on the fact that TBC has always played the OLB position, whereas, Claridge's role doesn't have much of a past to be defined. I think Claridge can play both OLB and ILB. JMO

Last edited by PATRIOTS-80; 05-02-2006 at 01:50 AM..
PATRIOTS-80 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-02-2006, 01:55 AM   #2
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,354
Default

good post, interesting. thanks.

my preference is for Vrabel to be VERY excited to play inside - my sense is that he's not - and for the Patriots to have found a steal/eventual stud in Jeremy Mincey.
patsox23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:03 AM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
shirtsleeve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: stuck at work
Posts: 2,730
Default

How about Mincey playing Mike? His size and weight are almost the same as TJ's and he specialized in blowing up the run in college. Oops patsox already said that.

I think Mincey and Roach are both here to compete for the same job. Immediate back-up Mike and eventual ILB starter at either pos. as their experience grows.

Mincey is way too slow for Elephant. Has little burst and few moves to work around the end. Probably will be a career Mike ILB for us. The scouting reports say he excels at blowing up the point of attack against the run, shedding blockers and making tackles.
shirtsleeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:07 AM   #4
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 283
Default

I was hoping we found a steal/eventual stud last year when we drafted Claridge. Those hopes have not disappeared, or even diminished. Claridge could easily fullfill Ted Johnson's role on running downs (same body type and style of play), while being subbed (by Beisel) on passing situations.
Gon_Trevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:16 AM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
shirtsleeve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: stuck at work
Posts: 2,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gon_Trevil
I was hoping we found a steal/eventual stud last year when we drafted Claridge. Those hopes have not disappeared, or even diminished. Claridge could easily fullfill Ted Johnson's role on running downs (same body type and style of play), while being subbed (by Beisel) on passing situations.
I think you are right about Claridge. Rodney says so, too. But we pull the 4th LB on passing downs and Put in a nickel back.
shirtsleeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 08:07 AM   #6
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
smg93's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shirtsleeve
Mincey is way too slow for Elephant. Has little burst and few moves to work around the end. Probably will be a career Mike ILB for us.
I don't know if this makes a difference but according to reports, he ran a 4.65 40 for the Pats. Though I know it takes a lot more than just speed to replace Willie, the fact that he has the size and speed right now gives him a good headstart at learning the position I think.
smg93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 08:13 AM   #7
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shirtsleeve
Mincey is way too slow for Elephant..
He's faster than WMG. WMG made up for getting old by getting smart, bue speed wise he was slowwwww.
spacecrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 08:22 AM   #8
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTS-80
Roach obviously has no chance at breaking into the starting lineup, but he is a protypical Mike
You can't say this, just because he was a UDFA. Remember Randall Gay?

Roach was highly rated prior to the draft, 4th best ILB according to Kiper and up there with other draft sources. Kiper's rating and a couple bucks will get you coffee at Dunkin Donuts, but several sources rated him highly.

Yeah he has long odds, but "obviously he has no chance" is not accurate.

Trying to break into the starting TJ linebacker position position means he is competing with Claridge and Beisel if Vrabel goes outside. It's not like they have a lock on the position.

The thing about a new guy is that you have no idea how he will do. JAG, nothing, or something special, the possibiltiies are open. With Izzo and Alexander, we know what we have. THey aren't likely to be starters. But no one knows about Roach or Claridge yet.

So "obviously" and "no chance" aren't words I'd use for Roach (or any new guy).
spacecrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 08:26 AM   #9
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,569
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecrime
Trying to break into the starting TJ linebacker position position means he is competing with Claridge and Beisel if Vrabel goes outside. It's not like they have a lock on the position.
And that's really the only spot that's needed. On 2nd, 3rd and long we could easily put a Jarvis Green in on the edge to rush the passer. That's all McGinest did on those downs.
BelichickFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 08:45 AM   #10
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,336
Default Ryan Claridge

I keep reading here how Claridge is a "Ted Johnson type," which surprises me -- his draft profiles all emphasized his agility in pass coverage and quickness as an outside rusher (he was also a varsity tennis player).

Some snippets from 2005 draft reports:

STRENGTHS

"The most athletic linebacker of a very active group, Claridge is the highlight reel player always in the opposing backfields and always making the key play."

"He is best when making plays on the move, as he has the lateral agility and foot speed to pursue plays along the sidelines. His quickness and edge rushing ability makes him better suited to play on the outside in a 4-3 defense or at weak-side in a 3-4 alignment."

"Claridge is a very good athlete with the foot quickness, agility, balance and playing speed to run down ball carriers all over the field. He is a smart and instinctive linebacker who reads the quarterback quickly in zone coverage, breaks and closes on the ball fast"

"He does a good job of staying on the receiver's hip through routes and shows the ability to handle the switch-off working in the zone."


WEAKNESSES

"He lacks ideal strength to face up and will generally get stymied in attempts to disengage from blockers working in-line."

"Claridge does not use his hands consistently to keep blockers off him - he gets slowed down a lot by low/cut blocks and can’t get free from blockers if they can get a hold of him. He does not move through traffic well and needs a clear path to chase plays down in pursuit."

"He needs to improve his lower body strength, as he does not have the "sand in his pants" to hold ground firmly at the point of attack."
patchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566