Monday Morning Draft Thoughts - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2006, 12:16 PM   #1
Rookie
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 20
Default Monday Morning Draft Thoughts

A collection of random thoughts on the draft:

#1: One of the best things about this draft, IMO, is that we didn't take a center. That implies the rumors about Koppen being done are BS, which makes me very happy. Ditto us not drafting a SS early, which implies RH's rehab is coming along as well.....maybe he won't start the season on the PUP list afterall.

#2: Chad Jackson must be a great player if Belioli was willing to trade up for a receiver of all things.

#3: Mills was a great pick. He was the highest ranked guy at his position, is extremely versatile, and should be a big upgrade over Pass.

#4: At first I was confused as to why we would take a TE on day #1, but after a little more thought, I like the pick. Whoever we drafted at TE was basically guaranteed to make the team, so it seems reasonable to not be stuck with a 7th round bust or UDFA. In fact, considering that he's filling a currently empty spot, I guess you could say this pick represents our largest upgrade of the draft. The pick also suggests more double TE sets, which, IMO, is a very good thing.

#5: I was also pleased that we didn't draft a CB in the 1st round like many draft "experts" were predicting. Hobbs and Samuel are young/underrated, and will keep improving if given the chance. Letting young players develop before throwing more picks away is a wise choice; just ask the Lions.

#6: The O'Callaghan (sic?) pick was another good one IMO. If it weren't for all the injuries (the guy has hurt his hand and had several shoulder surgeries in the recent past) he would have been a much higher pick. In the middle rounds I think you can afford to risk a single pick on a highly talented, but injury prone guy. It'll also be nice to make Kazcur actually compete for the starting job at RT job.

#7: I don't really know what to think about the late picks. I guess at that point your just looking for guys who can potentially make the team. If Belioli thinks the guys we got are best equiped to do so, then I'm happy about that.
Warren=underrated is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-01-2006, 12:30 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,210
My Mood: Angry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren=underrated
Hobbs and Samuel are young/underrated, and will keep improving if given the chance.
Don't forget Gay. Gay is actually better than Hobbs, although everyone on this board continually forgets it.
sieglo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 12:34 PM   #3
Rookie
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sieglo
Don't forget Gay. Gay is actually better than Hobbs, although everyone on this board continually forgets it.
I like him too, but he is coming back from an injury, whereas Hobbs (so far as I know) is 100% ready to go.
Warren=underrated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 12:35 PM   #4
Moderator
 
T-ShirtDynasty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Eating it! (Humble Pie that is)
Posts: 3,562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sieglo
Don't forget Gay. Gay is actually better than Hobbs, although everyone on this board continually forgets it.
What makes you say that? Genuienly curious. I'm a big fan of Blue, really am, but I think I expect The III to have more impact over the long run.
T-ShirtDynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 01:15 PM   #5
On The Game Day Roster
 
jimmyjames's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: portland, or
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-ShirtDynasty
What makes you say that? Genuienly curious. I'm a big fan of Blue, really am, but I think I expect The III to have more impact over the long run.

I'm with you. I see Hobbs as the clear number 1 corner with Warfield, Samuel and Gay going into camp to fight it out for number 2.
jimmyjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 01:19 PM   #6
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

I agree on the Center thing - unless there was just never a value they liked, you have to conclude that they're comfortable with Koppen's rehab and Hoch as the backup. Of course, then there's Koppen's impending FA - as I type this I get the feeling maybe the lack of a Center draftee was more to do with never finding a good value because between Koppen's rehab and one year left it's hard to believe they wouldn't draft a Center.
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 01:24 PM   #7
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,615
Default

I wouldn't put much stock in them not taking a center. Even though the center makes the lines calls, the Pats last two centers were rookies when they started.
Did BB chose a RB as a way of getting a jab in at his old tormentor Polian and the Dolts?????
Ochmed Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 01:25 PM   #8
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 57
Default No Center?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan
I agree on the Center thing - unless there was just never a value they liked, you have to conclude that they're comfortable with Koppen's rehab and Hoch as the backup. Of course, then there's Koppen's impending FA - as I type this I get the feeling maybe the lack of a Center draftee was more to do with never finding a good value because between Koppen's rehab and one year left it's hard to believe they wouldn't draft a Center.
Interesting that they didn't even take a fly'er on Degory or Ross. Hmm
Rene Vallieres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 01:26 PM   #9
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren=underrated
#2: Chad Jackson must be a great player if Belioli was willing to trade up for a receiver of all things.
Not to jinx Chad or anything, but didn't BB take Bethel Johnson about the same spot as he took Jackson?
spacecrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 01:27 PM   #10
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecrime
Not to jinx Chad or anything, but didn't BB take Bethel Johnson about the same spot as he took Jackson?
Branch too
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC