Pats offense - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-2010, 03:14 PM   #1
glm
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 755
Default Pats offense

Based on what we have now, how do you think they'll do?
glm is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-24-2010, 03:17 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,114
Default Re: Pats Offense

I still think the Pats have needs on the Oline. Light Kaczur and Koppen are liabilities at this point.
Marqui is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 03:21 PM   #3
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Pats Offense

The offense is better than last year.

QB Brady is now healthy. Hoyer should be a better backup after a year.

OL All are now healthy and Vollmer's experience will make the line better than in 2009.

WR We are at least even. There is a large dropoff in the slot from Welker to Edelman. But there is a large gain at the other WR positions, with the addition of Holt, Tate and Price.

TE A major improvement with three quality TE's.

RB We are about the same. Perhaps we will ahve one of taylor or Morris for the entire season, giving us a reasonable 3-man rotation. In any case, these are the same players and we should be at least the same.



Quote:
Originally Posted by glm View Post
Based on what we have now, how do you think they'll do?
mgteich is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 03:21 PM   #4
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Fencer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,424
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Pats Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marqui View Post
I still think the Pats have needs on the Oline. Light Kaczur and Koppen are liabilities at this point.
Two of the three had recent Pro Bowl seasons. I think they can be worked with.

The third, hopefully, will be relegated to being the top backup.
__________________
"To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness." -- Oscar Wilde

Last edited by Fencer; 04-24-2010 at 03:21 PM..
Fencer is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 03:28 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
resdubwhite's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,482
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Pats Offense

Surprised theres been no change at RB, or a little help for the o-line. Tommy has more targets though.
Vollmer and Edelmenn will be a year better.
Someone needs to sit down with Logan and Brady though and get something signed.

Gronk (is this now the official fans name), Hernandez and Price will lift the load on Moss. So yeah. Hoping for a more productive 2010.
resdubwhite is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 03:32 PM   #6
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 811
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Pats Offense

Even after the draft, I am worried about the offense. We are counting on rookies & 2nd year players plus we didn't really upgrade the OL. I would feel better if Welker didn't get hurt last season.
__________________
They're like little action figures.
thechris is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 03:32 PM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,548
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Pats Offense

Think we will be fine.. Brady has now fully recovered from his surgery, added Tory Holt which is not a huge upgrade, but better than Galloway.. Edelman has a year experience, Welker will be back late in the season.. Tate is an unknown, but he has had a year red shirting..

The three tight ends are huge, the O Line is fine, some new guys that add depth... The Dante Scarnecchia School of O linemen will soon be in session..

Our ST's have improved dramatically, which help everything.. it is all good folks..
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 04:34 PM   #8
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Grizzafted's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 998
Default Re: Pats Offense

I thought that with Dwyer still on the board, they might think about packaging next year's fifth to grab him, but in the absence of that I'm still worried about the running game. We need someone fast. There are a lot of old legs and Maroney back there, and that's not going to cut it.

I'm very happy with the draft from a defensive standpoint. I think we'll regret not drafting Dez Bryant...like REALLY regret it, but McCourty looks like he could be pro bowl talent so I'm over that. Cunningham is going to have huge expectations and a large role to fill. Spikes, Hernandez, and Gronk are sure-fire things. I think those three and McCourty are almost guaranteed to be major contributors in the next five years. Still, we need a running game. If we had someone quick and dangerous back there, it would put a lot of pressure on defenses to figure out what to do with their safeties. As it stands now, again, there is going to be huge pressure on the defense to step up and perform because this unit is not going to score at will. It's a 24 ppg offense without Welker, and that won't cut it unless the defense really steps up. I'm hopeful but don't expect much out of the team next season. That schedule is brutal.
__________________
bring 'em on...
Grizzafted is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 04:58 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
italia44's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Birthplace of John Casale,Revere,Ma R.I.P."Fredo"
Posts: 3,287
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Pats Offense

I would have taken Dez Bryant,however I thought BB did a masterful job with the trades.Getting the #2 in 2011 was just highway robbery.

looking back on the first round,I think we got screwed-up by the Chargers trade,coming up to get Ryan Matthews.If they had stayed in place,I think that Houston would have taken Matthews and we would have gone for Kareem Jackson.

Of course,essentially we got McCourty and ended up with a 3rd,which we didn't have.

So,essentially Jackson-DB vs McCourty-DB + Draft choice..........pretty da-n good,when you look at it that way.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Audentes Fortuna Juvat

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
italia44 is offline  
Old 04-24-2010, 05:00 PM   #10
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Patspsycho's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 20 minutes from Foxboro
Posts: 9,930
Default Re: Pats Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by italia44 View Post
I would have taken Dez Bryant,however I thought BB did a masterful job with the trades.Getting the #2 in 2011 was just highway robbery.

looking back on the first round,I think we got screwed-up by the Chargers trade,coming up to get Ryan Matthews.If they had stayed in place,I think that Houston would have taken Matthews and we would have gone for Kareem Jackson.

Of course,essentially we got McCourty and ended up with a 3rd,which we didn't have.

So,essentially Jackson-DB vs McCourty-DB + Draft choice..........pretty da-n good,when you look at it that way.

BB has said that McCourty was his target all along.
Patspsycho is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PATs Offense: 4th and 6th in two stats JR4 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 15 11-11-2008 06:21 PM
Pats have #1 Offense AND Defense now... richpats PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 10 12-23-2007 08:12 PM
Parcells: PATs have best Offense EVER! JR4 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 11-20-2007 04:39 PM
The Pats will go only as far as the offense carries them.... MrBigglesWorth PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 15 01-07-2007 10:24 AM
Another Breakdown of the Pats Offense PonyExpress PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 39 10-13-2006 09:45 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566