patsinthesnow

This may be an easy answer either way, but I find it a tough answer. Is Moss good enough to outweigh the lack of depth?

PittPatriot

It depends who the QB is. I think Brady works best with receivers who are superior with timing, precise route running and sure hands. Moss could outweigh anyone if he had a QB that could hit the long ball with regularity (unfortunately, that is not Brady's best throw).

I think the Ravens will be looking to tee-off on Brady until he shows he can get Edelman/Watson the ball in the quick passing game to offset the blitz.

Brady_12

Not sure. It would be nice to see what Moss, Edelman, Watson/Aiken could do if teams respected our running game. A one-dimensional offense is much easier to defend.

alvinnf

They played a different more methodical game with, Brown, Branch and Givens. Then every once in a while they would max protect and hit a deep come back. That's better football. More run formation, now it's gun and chuck.

Jimke

Are you kidding? A great wide receiver, converted quarterback,

and special teams player vs three legitimate wide receivers.

BoTown

Nothing tops that 2007 core of Moss, Welker, Gaffney, and Stallworth. But the 2004 core of Branch, Givens, Brown, and Patten was special, too.

With Welker likely out for the playoffs, this year's core will be the weakest since the SB 36 squad.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

TheComeback

Brady's deep ball has definitely regressed. I think he can handle the blitz. The question is if anyone can get open.