mayoclinic

This from the Globe yesterday:

Belichick hints (again) at tackle situation's future - Extra Points - Boston.com

Belichick called out Vollmer for his rare ability to apparently play both LT and RT equally comfotable. I've been one of those suggesting we move Matt Light to RT and keep Vollmer at LT, where he's clearly our future. Sound's like BB doesn't like that idea:

"'In my brilliance,' Belichick said with a smile, 'I put [Light] at right tackle as a rookie. It didn’t really work out at all. He has the physical skills to play over there. But, then, he just … Matt’s just a left tackle. When you look at his skills, I don’t think you look at him and say, ‘Well, I don’t think he has the skills to play right tackle.’ But he’s just much more comfortable on the left side and he’s a much better left tackle than he was a right tackle, when we tried to play him there his rookie year. Once we got him back to left tackle, he was a much better football player. That was his rookie year, so maybe if it was his third year, he would’ve adjusted to it better. I don’t know, we just left him at left because he’s done a good job for us over there.'"

Sounds like we'll be seeing Light at LT and Vollmer at RT for much of the remainder of the season. I have nothing against Light, but I feel that Vollmer is our future at LT, so I would like to get him anchored there as soon as possible.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi

BelichickFan

Playing future LT at RT as rookies isn't that uncommon, this is a good situation and I never thought they'd move Light to RT at this point in the season at this point in his career.

The interesting thing is what they do this offseason :

Keep Light, Vollmer and Kaczer and have Kaczer as a good swing backup.
Keep Light, Vollmer and Kaczer and move Kaczer to Guard as many think he can play.
Cut/trade Light, save $4M or so and have Vollmer and Kaczer at LT/RT.
Cut/trade Kaczer and have Light and Vollmer at LT/RT.

Kaczur's new contract is a little tricky with an option bonus. He looks cuttable WRT the cap but I doubt that's the plan. A lot of draft people thought he'd be a Guard when drafted, putting him at Neal's spot (unless Neal is re-signed) could work well. They may be ready to move on from Light and save the money, though.

ctpatsfan77

According to Miguel (emphasis mine):

"The deal includes an option bonus of $3.5 million. It is not known when the option bonus is due, but there is a clause in the contract that says if the option is not exercised, Kaczur's base salary would jump to $2.72 million in 2009. That seems to mean that Kaczur's option bonus is due at some point this year. Kaczur also has workout bonuses of $100,000 in 2010, 2011, and 2012."

__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

102 Pat

He might of been saying that to also try to keep the Bills guessing if he might line up at RT on sunday. You never know with BB!

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


This offseason, it's almost like Belichick is saying, "I'm never going to let that happen again."

Mike Reiss 7/19/12

Bill B.

I would keep Levoir over Kaczur as a swing backup. The times tht he has stepped in and played, I thought he did well. Better tan Kaczur anyway.

PATSYLICIOUS

That's the lineup I'd like to see as well. Vollmer shouldn't have a problem switching to LT when Matt's time is done here, Kaczur was an LT his rookie season and was able to switch. Will be interesting to see what the teams plans are for Matt next year.

robertweathers

I've supported Kazur in the past but his ankle injuries are impeading his ablity to handle the speed rushers on the outside.

Vollmer has a ways to go but he seemed to do pretty well vs Peppers on Sun.

__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick

mayoclinic

I would, too, especially if I could get something for Kaczur in a trade.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi

mgteich

I indicated yesterday that I thought that Vollmer's play at RT was solid and important. It seems that I agree with coach.

Now, Belichick has three options open with Light: trade, extend (best option for me), starting LT and starting LG (if Mankins goes). AS belichick stated, Light is NOT a RT. We are much better off trading Light than moving him to RT for a year.

Belichick also has options for Kaczur: starting RT, starting RG, backup OT, and backup OG.

This is a solid position to be in for 2010. With Light and Vollmer as starters (and LeVoir and Kaczur as backups), there is no pressure at all to draft a tackle.

The "problem" on the offensive line is that we have ZERO starting guards signed for 2009 and we have weak depth. Personally, I think that we are solid at OT for 2010 although I would be fine with drafting a developmental OT and keeping Kaczur as a backup or starting OG and OT.

mayoclinic

It's possible we could trade Kaczur, if someone was willing to offer anything. I have no idea what his value would be.

As you say, we're in a solid position for 2010, and there is no pressure to draft a tackle. That doesn't mean that we couldn't draft a RT if the value was there, as the long term future should clearly have Vollmer at LT.

My 3 favorite OG prospects for the Pats are all guys with the athleticism to possibly play RT as well: Seniors Mike Iupati (who has exception feet for his size, and who some teams are rumored to be considering as a potential OT) and Vladimir Ducasse (who has played LT and has good feet), and junior Gabe Carimi of Wisconsin. Any of these guys could be drafted to succeed Neal at RG, but could potentially be moved to RT long term if the need/opportunity arose.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi