ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
The defense that played great for the last half of the season, stopped JAX and gave up almost nothing against Denver will all be back (presuming the signing of Hawkins). In addition, we will have improvements from the IR.
While there are potential upgrades, this is a complete roster, and a better one than we had for the end of the season. I think that we should sign Hawkins ASAP and then start to focus on the offense.
I have presumed that the ERFA's have been re-signed since they have no choices.
I did not include the re-signing of Poteat, Stone, Chatham and Davis. Poteat seems the most likely signing, especially if Poole is to be cut before paying him his roster bonus.
This is a top defense.
Last edited by mgteich; 01-18-2006 at 10:06 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Man, you really think Poole will be back? I can see Starks, but Poole would surprise me. That image of his almost empty locker 3 or 4 days after being placed on IR keeps popping into my head.
I didn't really mean this roster as a prediction, but your point with regard to Poole is well-taken. I would like to see himn cut before his roster bonus is due.
I edited the roster to add Poteat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-ShirtDynasty
Man, you really think Poole will be back? I can see Starks, but Poole would surprise me. That image of his almost empty locker 3 or 4 days after being placed on IR keeps popping into my head.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me." To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
We're talking about the Poole of three years ago after two season-ending injuries.??????????
__________________
Felger started his question, "Correct me if I'm wrong," BB quickly interjected, "I can't wait--"
``The officials now are evaluating the players and their performance, I mean, that's great,'' Belichick deadpanned. ``I can't say how much that means to me, really.''
Maybe he is long gone, that isn't my call to make. I watched the tape of the Oakland game, he was our best CB then and nearly made the play one-on-one with Moss - Moss had to make a great play to make that catch. Mangini, Pees, and BB huddled right after that play and changed the LB's coverage - because Geno got sucked up on the uncovered TE leaving Poole alone.
We have had veterans who went through injury spells, so I see no reason to hold that against him. What it boils down to is what I saw on the field before he got hurt, if he comes back he and Hobbs are our two best, with Asante at nickelback. I have no problem with that line-up.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me." To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
If Poole and Starks see the field as a Pat next year, your setting your self up for disaster.
This is the second time in two years Poole has pissed of coaching staff with reluctants to play through playible injuries. To bad too, the guy has or had talent.