12-05-2009, 03:51 PM
|
#11
|
|
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
|
Re: The Offensive Line
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich
CLADY vs MAYO
We needed an ILB very, very badly. We still had two more years of an acceptable LT in Light. The choice was a a simple one. As you we found out, it is possible to draft a stud OT in the 2nd round if you are williong to wait a bit before making him a starter. Belichick's strategy seem to ahve worked fine.
OHER vs. BUTLER, TATE, EDELMAN and a 2010 2nd
The last three were bonuses. We needed a future starter at corner. Most evaluators had Butler as a value choice for the patriots at 23. If Light is gone, we can draft another OT in the 2nd round as we did this year. With LeVoir as backup, the rook would have a year to develop.
BOTTOM LINE
I don't think that this team would be better off with Clady and Oher instead of Mayo and Butler. This is especially so since we had two years with three picks in the second round, one of which could be used for an OT.
MY QUESTION MARK
Chung instead of Levitre or Unger
|
I'm not sure you and I could disagree more on this if we both set out to do so. Well, such is the nature of message boards. 
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
|
|
|