Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I agree. The most that would happen is that the patriots would need to send a letter. More importantly, the issue may be cleared up or put on a list of items to clarified in the new CBA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick
I don't see that the grievance actually has anything to say about the trade at all. From what's been reported, nobody is claiming that the trade wasn't legitimate; it's a procedural matter about the 5-day letter.
In my non-professional opinion, it would be simply nonsensical for an arbitrator to rule that NEITHER team has the right to send a letter that is procedurally required. If they rule that Oakland may not send it, then New England must. This could help Seymour's attempts to slow the process to a crawl and piss everybody off, but it doesn't seem like a substantive change in a player's rights.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188
A union victory in the grievance would not overturn the trade. It would only say that the Raiders can not send him a five-day letter.
right. it's only by extrapolation that the Globe suggests that this would lead to a series of events wherein the League would invalidate the Trade. IMHO, there is somewhere between .0001 and .001 probability that the League would do that (absent any unknown information and by definition absent Seymour's flunking the physical), since it would set a precedent that any star player with several years left in his career could bully the league into killing a deal he didn't like.
i don't know what the CBA says about "no trade" clauses, but this suggests that players who feel very strongly about being traded should make working them into their contracts part of their negotiating process. In fact, as I think about it, if there is a provision for a "no trade" clause being part of a contract and if indeed Seymour didn't get that included in his deal, then he doesn't have a leg to stand on.
__________________
"Winners, I am convinced, imagine their dreams first. They want it with all their heart and expect it to come true. There is, I believe, no other way to live." Joe Montana
Time to think about which beer goes best with a balogna sandwich..
Oscar Meyer can only handle a weak lager. If you have a hearty German or kosher bologna you may branch out into ales. If like my daughter you insist on soy bologna, you're stuck with O'Douls.
Oscar Meyer can only handle a weak lager. If you have a hearty German or kosher bologna you may branch out into ales. If like my daughter you insist on soy bologna, you're stuck with O'Douls.
right. it's only by extrapolation that the Globe suggests that this would lead to a series of events wherein the League would invalidate the Trade.
I am pretty sure that is a mute point as far as this trade is concerned. The NFLPA may still wish to grieve it, but with Seymour reporting and playing on Monday the trade is a done deal. No reversals now. No turning back.
I am pretty sure that is a mute point as far as this trade is concerned. The NFLPA may still wish to grieve it, but with Seymour reporting and playing on Monday the trade is a done deal. No reversals now. No turning back.
One can only wish the point and all around it were mute.
However, we'll have to settle for it being moot.
__________________
No player who has practiced even once that season or in training camp can go on PUP. Ever.
Seymour filed the grievance Friday afternoon. By Friday evening he suddenly "found god" (god is a senile rat-like owner in Oakland.) It makes a lot of sense that, after filing the grievance someone in a high position told him he has virtually no chance to win this one, and his 5-day letter is in effect right now.
And a union victory in the grievance could overturn the trade (the logic of which I don't get, but that's another matter), and that takes place after Seymour practices and/or plays for Oakland, how does that work?
they are not right.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Oscar Meyer can only handle a weak lager. If you have a hearty German or kosher bologna you may branch out into ales. If like my daughter you insist on soy bologna, you're stuck with O'Douls.