mgteich

I agree with your roster. I have two issues as I struggle with the final two "cuts".

ISSUE ONE
Alex Smith is better than a couple of players at the bottom of the roster. In any case, I expect us to trade one of our TE's for a 5th. Both Watson and Smith would be bargains since their bonuses have been paid by the patriots.

ISSUE TWO
While I also have Lenon for now, he may go if we are really going to play a lot more 4-3. 15 players for the front seven may be sufficient. Of course, it is Crable that is the question mark. He may need another year of development before contributing much. If that is the situation, I want to keep Lenon to add flexibility in our linebacking corp.

BOTTOM LINE
With no trades, Smith could easily be the best 53rd choice instead of Alex Smith. Of course, Belichick is likely to keep only 52 of what we have, with the 53rd player coming from another team's final cuts.

jmt57

This is next to impossible for me to answer since I don't know who the other 48 are that already made the final cut. For example, McGowan's name is on the list but not Williams; does that mean Tank is already included on the roster - or is not up for consideration? If Williams is already on the roster then I don't keep McGowan too, but if he is not then McGowan is one of my five picks.

But even without knowing the rest of the roster, my most likely cuts would be Wendell, Pryor, Ventrone, TBC, and a TE. Most likely to stay would be Wright, Aiken, Green, Crable and Hochstein.

maverick4

I don't see how Thomas can be the hybrid blocker/catcher; every time I watch him I'm very unimpressed by his blocking.

matt9071

Im doubtful that four tightends will make the roster. I would rather keep five rb's. we may have a commitee of runnnig backs but they are all injury prone. My prediction is that either watson or thomas will be traded. wichever one brings higher trade value.

satz

Considering these 2 pts

1)Baker was covered by a backup LB as their starter was out

2)watson played 76% of snaps last year where he was asked to block

3) Smithwas got for a 5th ....people make it sound like we never cut a 5 rd player.
Smith gets cut

how can some say baker is better when he was again covered by eagles Backup players due to the ILB sitting out of injury?

__________________
NFL - A perfect american business model .
HarleyDavidson-Turning gas into noise for more than 100 yrs without the side effects of power and still making a tonne of money a great american business model.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Synovia

The problem with that is, the 4th TE, whoever it is (whether Smith, or Thomas), is significantly better than the 5th RB, BJGE. Not to mention, finding RBs mid season is MUCH easier than finding TEs.

mgteich

Finding a #3 TE during the season is NOT difficult at all. DeVree says hi!

However, I think that you setting up a straw man. I don't think we need a 4th TE. I also don't think we need a 5th RB.

bagwell368

Reiss and others have said that Smith was used most at H back in pre season, and played well overall.

Clearly Baker is the #1, and Watson is the likely best back-up for him.

Thomas's big issus are: he has trouble staying healthy, and he can't block my grandmother, and she's been dead since 1946. His cap number is negligable, so if they cut to 3, he would be the one I think.

I hate Watson, but, if Baker gets hurt the depth is so bad if Watson is dealt, so I think you have to keep him.

p.s. - BJGE will be on the roster but won't dress until the one of the top 4 backs goes down - and they will.