mgteich

The only surprises I expect before the draft are possible trades. Trades are no a surprise during Draft Weekend.

KY Pats Fan

Seymour for a 1st round pick.

robertweathers

I agree that trades are not a suprise but it's the type of trade that can be suprising. For example, I don't think anyone expected the Moss trade 2 years ago. Suspected maybe. Expected no.

I don't expect it but if Peppers and Suggs are to be acquired, I'm pretty sure it would be on draft day as the Pats and their trading partner to wait until the 11th hour.

__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick

Jimke

You're probably going to be ridiculed by most of the forum on

this one but the idea is not as nutty as it may appear. There

is no way Seymour will re-sign with the Patriots unless he is given

15 million per year with the same guaranteed money as Haynesworth.

If he is franchised, he will simply hold out. One factor would be whether

the pick is early first round.

mgteich

I don't that think that this is a nutty idea at all. We could then sign Jason Taylor, and use our new first on a DE and still draft a linebacker at 23, and an additional top 100 pick DT. I think that I would like to have a tentative extensioin of Jarvis Green in place (I think that this could be cap neutral).

DL: Warren, Wilfork, Green, 1st rounder or Seymour, Smith, Hood (3rd rounder)
LB: Taylor, Thomas, Mayo, 1st rounder, Guyton, Bruschi, Woods, TBC, Crable

The advantage of the frst rounder instead of Seymour is that the new player would have a 5 year contract and a cap hit in the $2.5M range as Mayo does.

mayoclinic

I've always liked that idea, if someone would give us a 1st rounder. There's no doubt Seymour is one of the best 3-4 DE's around, but between age, injuries and contract demands I think the Pats would be open to the right deal. I've always felt that Wilfork and Mankins would resign for reasonable deals but that Seymour was more of a Samuel-like "money first" kind of guy, and might end up being the hardest to resign, with a likely gap between what he thought he was worth and what the FO valued him at.

My question is, if GB or Denver were to offer their #2 for him, would you still bite? How much would it take? We could probably get Jarron Gilbert with that pick and groom him to be Seymour's replacement. What about a 2010 #1?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi

TealSox

Nah, I don't bite on it.

Having Seymour in a contract year and getting a compensation pick for him after he signs elsewhere is better than getting a second round pick. Hopefully he would play, like most do in their last years of their contract, all out and be the beast we know he can be. After that, he can get his money from the Broncos, Browns, Dolphins, Jets, etc and the Pats can plug the hole with either a 2009 rookie like Jarron Gilbert or draft a guy in 2010 (like the guy from Nebraska).

Hate to see him go to a rival, but if he is asking for Haynesworth money, than his contract will be the poison pill that restricts that team from making other moves in the future.

__________________
"It's not whether you get knocked down; it's whether you get up."Vince Lombardi


Pats fan since 1993

Sleeping King

No one is trading a 1st Round pick for Seymour. A lot of people on this board are bat s... crazy. Any team that traded for him would have the same problem the Pats will have next offseason in regards to trying to meet his insane contract demands.

mgteich

A 2010 is the same to me as a 2009 2nd. The 2011 comp pick is the same as a 2009 5th. So, yes, I would consider a 2009 2nd, if I liked some of the DE's.

javajunky

Why trade him this year when we can fanchise and trade him next year? It seems waiting year is like having your cake and getting to eat it too.