02-23-2009, 07:10 AM
|
#7
|
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
|
Re: Bears commit to Kyle Orton, so no Cassel?
I think the Bears were always a long shot. They seem committed to mediocrity at the QB position. It could be just posturing, but I suspect they actually are willing to go with Orton given how long it took them to give up on Rex Grossman.
It's just amazing to me how stupid teams are acting. QB remains the most important position in the NFL. TB and the Jets collapsed and missed the playoffs, with poor QB play contributing. Minnesota would have been poised to go far in the playoffs with solid QB play. Chicago would likely have made the playoffs as well. In contrast, the Pats finished the regular season 4-0 behind stellar QB play from Cassel and finished with a better record than any of those teams, only missing the playoffs on a tiebreaking quirk. It's hard to envision Cassel allowing the losses to Oakland and Houston that put TB and Chicago out of the playoffs, or a 5-interception meltdown like Delhomme had against Arizona. San Francisco could actually be a contender in the weak NFC west with a QB like Cassel.
Arizona is reportedly willing to offer Kurt Warner more than $10M a year. Warner played well last year but he will be 38 in June, and it's not clear how much longer he can hold up for an entire season. Cassel is 26 and is likely to get better.
I think there's probably a lot of posturing going on right now, but the level of stupidity is somewhat staggering.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid
"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
|
|
|