TO vs. Moss - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-17-2008, 10:24 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,498
My Mood: Cool
Default TO vs. Moss

Over on the CMB, we have this comparison every now and then.

Just curious-how would you guys compare the 2, and which is better?

To me, Owens excels at short/intermediate routes, while Moss excels in stretching the field.

I would call it a draw as both have different strengths. However-what they have in common is that they command so much respect from opposing DCs, that it ends up being "pick your poison" when they have to game plan. And not to mention too both are VERY underrated blockers.

As for who's the better teammate, gonna have to go with Moss. With his previous stints in Minny and Oakland, he ended up being the scapegoat when things went sour for those teams. Owens has become a decent teammate here in Dallas, but, of course, his history is well chronicled overall.
DisgruntledTunaFan is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-17-2008, 10:42 PM   #2
JFK
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 973
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

The only thing Owens has over Moss is Yards After Short yard Catches. Moss isn't as strong and agile so Owens but Moss is still better. His hands are godly.
JFK is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 10:51 PM   #3
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 45
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

TO definitely gets the win.......when it comes to *****ing out your quarterback. (calling Jeff Garcia gay / blaming McNabb for the superbowl loss)
demerit is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 10:54 PM   #4
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 45
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

TO also gets the win....when it comes to crying after a playoff loss. Randy Moss loss the Superbowl with an undefeated season. Did he cry? Maybe after he got home, but certainly not during a press conference.
demerit is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 10:59 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,838
My Mood: Doh
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

I think TO is more underrated, and it's definitely a close competition. They're both exceptional at what they do, but I do think that Moss is ultimately better. TO is exceptionally hard to contain, whereas Moss requires an entire defensive gameplan that's pretty much predicated on stopping him.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BradyFTW! is online now  
Old 09-17-2008, 11:06 PM   #6
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 45
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

I was a little hard on TO. The guy is just about as good as Randy Moss, any football fan will say that. He's pretty much the reason why the Cowboys are favored to win the Superbowl. Nuff said.
demerit is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 11:17 PM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Patjew's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Back in Rhode Island!!
Posts: 9,086
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

TO is a much better self-promoter.
__________________
Drink like a beast.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Patjew is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 11:30 PM   #8
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
ayjackson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 1,232
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

if TO had better hands, I'd take him every day....that said, I'm not sure....I'd like to see Moss have some better cold-weather games this year.
ayjackson is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 11:37 PM   #9
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: quincy
Posts: 1,420
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

TO is a better all around reciever on the field, more of an athlete. Moss has a more rare skill set, more apt to make the difficult catch...but he plays too much with his hands by his sides. BB has this same concern I suspect, and wants him to go up for every ball instead of letting it come to him. He doesnt go for the low ball very well, he dropped at least a few of those last year. And his stats in cold weather games are notedly below average. But he is a gamer, a great teammate, and I suspect a really solid guy. I think this will be his week to shine, maybe his best game of the season as the Phins cant cover a glass of milk.
jeffbiologist is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 11:44 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Patjew's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Back in Rhode Island!!
Posts: 9,086
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: TO vs. Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbiologist View Post
TO is a better all around reciever on the field, more of an athlete. Moss has a more rare skill set, more apt to make the difficult catch...but he plays too much with his hands by his sides. BB has this same concern I suspect, and wants him to go up for every ball instead of letting it come to him. He doesnt go for the low ball very well, he dropped at least a few of those last year. And his stats in cold weather games are notedly below average. But he is a gamer, a great teammate, and I suspect a really solid guy. I think this will be his week to shine, maybe his best game of the season as the Phins cant cover a glass of milk.
Didn't TO lead the league in drops last year?
__________________
Drink like a beast.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Patjew is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC