Originally Posted by borg

The Ravens owned the LOS. Want proof.........
The Patriots had 15 3rd down plays. Of the 15 plays, Brady was in shot gun 14 times. The one play Brady was under center, he handed off to Ridley.

So let me rephrase this, of the fifteen 3rd plays, Brady was under center ONCE.

THEREFORE, NE attempted ZERO play action passes the entire game on 3rd down......ZERO. If this doesn't tell you they they conceded the LOS to Baltimore, I don't know what else to tell you.
And it's not like these 3rd downs were long yardage situations. Of the 15, there were two 3rd and one plays, SIX 3rd and two plays, and one 3rd and three play. Of those 9 third and short plays, only three runs (2 from shot gun) which netted one 1st down.

Give Baltimore credit for something. They owned the LOS and forced NE to show its hand on passing plays via the shot gun. At least to me, they forced NE to string together plays to move down field, essentially a normal NE defensive game plan that waits for an offense to shoot themselves in the foot.....which NE did. But I'm saying, because Baltimore owned the LOS, they dictated to NE what style they had to play (shot gun), and they could afford to be patient sitting on pass the entire time.
As NE fans, haven't we accepted that moving the ball between the 20's is of minor importance and that games get decided in the redzone. Giving NE props for their big yards misses the reality of what really happened out there. Baltimore forced Brady into shot gun, and the team couldn't execute from 35 yards in. But Baltimore could.

Edit....I'm going to give props to Tony Masserati who stated before the game that NE would have to score some longer TDs because they couldn't handle Baltimore's squeeze close in. How right was he. Without play action or a big Gronk target, NE was futile in close. And the other problem, NE didn't have the long play personnel to compete vs Balt. either.

Originally Posted by SVN

You maybe right but pats got spooked and started believing in balt more than themselves. Those 3rd downs in BAL territory, any other team or game they wouldve played like it was 4 down territory. 3rd and 2 , assume its 4 down territory. They didnt, they played conservative , played into the ravens hands and lost.

Originally Posted by SVN

You maybe right but pats got spooked and started believing in balt more than themselves. Those 3rd downs in BAL territory, any other team or game they wouldve played like it was 4 down territory. 3rd and 2 , assume its 4 down territory. They didnt, they played conservative , played into the ravens hands and lost.